Minolta SRT's -- Gotta Love 'Em.

[Nokton48]

And here's a Minolta XK Mot with alot of character. Cool that it is an old Newspaper camera.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Minolta-XK-M...item2a17261e2e

XK Mots tend to be very 'spensive. Good price!

[colyn]

Originally Posted by Nokton48

And here's a Minolta XK Mot with alot of character. Cool that it is an old Newspaper camera.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Minolta-XK-M...item2a17261e2e

XK Mots tend to be very 'spensive. Good price!

Nice setup..

I once had one but sold it years ago. Wish I still had it..

I posted a photo of my newly repaired XE-7 here. http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...=42442&page=52

[Jack Conrad]

101... photo taken with an MC ROKKOR PF 58/1.4 @ 1.4.

[timor]

Originally Posted by Nokton48

And here's a Minolta XK Mot with alot of character. Cool that it is an old Newspaper camera.

It is cool, but it is a problem to. And this XK is a good sample (externally) of overused, probably abused camera. It looks like went to hell and back.

[Red Robin]

One of the reasons I enjoy RFF so much is because of how it, with threads like this one, promps me toget out and use other cameras in my collection. In this case a SR7. Another innovative piece of history. These older cameras weren't as easy to use as the "AUTO EVERYTHING" of today. When I get it right with a manual camera, luck aside, I feel like I've accomplished something. When I do it with one of these old gems I do wonder however "Are the planets aligned, or have I improved a little bit?" Not one to carry a camera to impress(I don't even own a Leica) I do enjoy the curious looks the old ones bring as some try to discern just "what kind of camera is that and where's the screen?" Usually backed up with" Film? Can you still buy film?

[super_tramp]

I'v got srt 101 with 50mm 1.8 minolta lens, I like it very much especially bookeh from 1.8, recently I bought Panagor 200mm f/3.5 for few pounds with SR mount, quite good lens

[mynikonf2]

[IMG][/IMG]

This one sold on e-bay a couple of months ago. Surprisingly it did not bring as much as I thought it would.

...here's one more shot:

[IMG][/IMG]

I have had an interest in this camera from the time it was introduced. Minolta did a good job designing & building it, IMO they just dropped the ball in promoting it.

[rover]

I am considering selling an SRT102. Just not enough room on my farm for all my stuff. It has taken me a few weeks to make this decision. My black 101 was at risk too, but I just have to keep that one.

[Fawley]

I wish I had spotted this thread when if first started. I have long wondered why Minoltas don't get more respect. My first camera (1971) was an SRT 101. That was my only camera until sometime in the late 80's when I saw a used XK in a store window and just had to have it. The XK continues to be my most loved camera, even after 4 years of investigating and buying rangefinders and other SLR systems. Its a fantastic camera, bright viewfinder, well placed meter readings in the viewfinder, and a very convenient exposure control adjustment while shooting in aperture priority.

[bobkonos]

Wow, finally saw this thread. Yes! I have a Minolta SRT-101 in its box with 28mm and 58mm Rokkor lenses. Got this kit several years ago because this model was my first SLR camera (bought in 1975) and the one on which I learned the rudiments of photography. So nostalgia hit me and I found this fine example. And it remains a great design and a great tool...

Gee Dan, another camera make we share in common....

Originally Posted by Nokton48

Well I just picked up another Minolta SRT in the RFF classifieds (for $40!). It's the SRT-202, which was the last SRT, and had the most features of any SRT. Camera is in great condition, although I did re-do the foam seals, in the mirror return, and back door. Good as new, ready to use. It even came with an EPX625 battery in good shape

This got me thinking about how much I enjoy using my SRT's. Really great cameras, and not expensive, either. I started out using SRT's in the 70s for newspaper work, then moving to Canon F1s, Nikon F/F2s, Leica, etc. But I have returned to the SRT.
The Rokkor lenses also work just great on my two Nex3s.

On the left, is the SRT100 I bought new (at the local camera store) in 1973, now covered in Cameraleather Green Kangaroo. Attached is the 100mm f3.5 MC Rokkor. On the right is my new SRT202, with my 21mm F2.8 MC Rokkor.
Today I'm running some Efke 25 through the bodies, to shake 'em out.

What's not to like? Any other Minolta SRT users out there?

[Nokton48]

Originally Posted by bobkonos

Wow, finally saw this thread. Yes! I have a Minolta SRT-101 in its box with 28mm and 58mm Rokkor lenses. Got this kit several years ago because this model was my first SLR camera (bought in 1975) and the one on which I learned the rudiments of photography. So nostalgia hit me and I found this fine example. And it remains a great design and a great tool...

Gee Dan, another camera make we share in common....

Hey There Bob,

Glad to hear you are also a Minolta SRT fan. Amazing how much life these cameras have left in them. And quite a steal, at current price levels. You should pick a few more focal lengths to have available for use. I've gotten them recently in the $5-$30 range so it's really hard to go wrong, especially if you can inspect them beforehand, or return them, if you don't like 'em.

Good Shooting.

-Dan

[Nokton48]

Originally Posted by Fawley

I wish I had spotted this thread when if first started. I have long wondered why Minoltas don't get more respect. My first camera (1971) was an SRT 101. That was my only camera until sometime in the late 80's when I saw a used XK in a store window and just had to have it. The XK continues to be my most loved camera, even after 4 years of investigating and buying rangefinders and other SLR systems. Its a fantastic camera, bright viewfinder, well placed meter readings in the viewfinder, and a very convenient exposure control adjustment while shooting in aperture priority.

I am looking forward to finding a nice XK this year. Posts like this just confirm that it's the right move to make.

[mynikonf2]

Originally Posted by Nokton48

I am looking forward to finding a nice XK this year. Posts like this just confirm that it's the right move to make.

Just saw this listing today:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/260944696379...ht_3506wt_1185

I'm not associated with this listing in any way, just thought you might want to take a look.

[Nokton48]

Mike, a question---

What equipment do you use to get all those lovely birding photos on your Flikr site? Those are amazing! As good as any I have seen

[mynikonf2]

Thanks, glad you enjoy them.
...this is the setup, a D200 w/80-400 Nikkor on a Gitzo 1340 w/Kirk BH-3 ballhead. Oh, I use the remote shutter release as well.

[21-135 Apo All Good]

My Dad was a Newspaper Photog back in the 60's & 70's. He used (2) SRT-101's and the famous SRM. I remember driving with him to Minolta's USA HQ in Ramsey, NJ to visit Mr. John Johnny to get cameras serviced while you waited! Pro service was one of the reasons why Newspaper Photogs bought Minoltas! That was a nice camera system!

The SRM had an electronic release built into the motor. One of his favorite lenses was an old preset Sun Optical 70-210 F4.8 with pistol grip. You squeezed the pistol grip to stop the lens down just prior to the shutter firing and a plunger made out of a common nail came out the back of the pistol grip just far enough to push an electronic release button (mounted on a small piece of aluminum) that was plugged into the mini-jack on the motor. Quite ingenious yet simple design that always worked. Enabled you to follow-focus or zoom as you took photos at 3 FPS! High School football never looked so good! Motorized "strips" of a QB handing-off to a Running Back were the norm instead of the exception! He used to tape the cropped vertical 1/2 frame images together with scotch tape and the Sports Editor would run them 3 or 4 columns wide by 5 or 6 inches deep, sometimes more! That rig of his was smaller & lighter than a Nikon F with cordless F-36 motor or a Canon F-1 with either of the two motors available for it. Metering was never a problem, his Luna-Pro did just fine! He used to rate Tri-X at 800 ASA and develope it in Ethol UFG for 7.5 minutes @ 70 degrees. By todays' standards the zoom wasn't the sharpest in the world, but I wish I still had it as it's use created thousands of published photos in the Home News of New Brunswick, NJ. Sadly it perished in a house fire after his passing.

I clicked on this thread to garner a piece of nostalgia for which I'm sincerely grateful. Thanks for letting me "take the ride"! Oh, and that link to the ebay sale of the "Newspaper beat XK" is also quite interesting. I may have been in it's company while it was actually being used by the Courier News Staff Photogs! As a "Stringer" I freelanced for the Home News decades ago, back when daily newspapers used to be owned by private family companies in competition with each other for readers & advertisers. I probably shot right next to whom ever was using the XK in that very same ad!

Again, thanks for the memories! Hope you all continue to enjoy your Minoltas!

Dave

[Roscoe]

Originally Posted by 21-135 Apo All Good

My Dad was a Newspaper Photog back in the 60's & 70's. He used (2) SRT-101's and the famous SRM. I remember driving with him to Minolta's USA HQ in Ramsey, NJ to visit Mr. John Johnny to get cameras serviced while you waited! Pro service was one of the reasons why Newspaper Photogs bought Minoltas! That was a nice camera system!

The SRM had an electronic release built into the motor. One of his favorite lenses was an old preset Sun Optical 70-210 F4.8 with pistol grip. You squeezed the pistol grip to stop the lens down just prior to the shutter firing and a plunger made out of a common nail came out the back of the pistol grip just far enough to push an electronic release button (mounted on a small piece of aluminum) that was plugged into the mini-jack on the motor. Quite ingenious yet simple design that always worked. Enabled you to follow-focus or zoom as you took photos at 3 FPS! High School football never looked so good! Motorized "strips" of a QB handing-off to a Running Back were the norm instead of the exception! He used to tape the cropped vertical 1/2 frame images together with scotch tape and the Sports Editor would run them 3 or 4 columns wide by 5 or 6 inches deep, sometimes more! That rig of his was smaller & lighter than a Nikon F with cordless F-36 motor or a Canon F-1 with either of the two motors available for it. Metering was never a problem, his Luna-Pro did just fine! He used to rate Tri-X at 800 ASA and develope it in Ethol UFG for 7.5 minutes @ 70 degrees. By todays' standards the zoom wasn't the sharpest in the world, but I wish I still had it as it's use created thousands of published photos in the Home News of New Brunswick, NJ. Sadly it perished in a house fire after his passing.

I clicked on this thread to garner a piece of nostalgia for which I'm sincerely grateful. Thanks for letting me "take the ride"! Oh, and that link to the ebay sale of the "Newspaper beat XK" is also quite interesting. I may have been in it's company while it was actually being used by the Courier News Staff Photogs! As a "Stringer" I freelanced for the Home News decades ago, back when daily newspapers used to be owned by private family companies in competition with each other for readers & advertisers. I probably shot right next to whom ever was using the XK in that very same ad!

Again, thanks for the memories! Hope you all continue to enjoy your Minoltas!

Dave

I have the Sun lens you mentioned, for Minolta, if you're interested. Although I dont have the pistol grip.

[21-135 Apo All Good]

I've discovered I made a slight mistake:

The Sun Optical Zoom lens is 85-210 F4.8, not 70-210. Sorry for the confusion. Found one today on ebay for $65.00 with Nikon T-mount. The pistol grip isn't an accessory, it's part of the preset diaphragm system. Part of what makes this piece of glass very unique.

Dave

[Fawley]

Originally Posted by Nokton48

I am looking forward to finding a nice XK this year. Posts like this just confirm that it's the right move to make.

I'm sure you'll love it. Its a very nice camera to use. The only problem is, sometimes I baby it too much. I don't use it much in the winter time, but then I have all those SRT 101's that I was picking up for a while whenever one went for a ridiculously low price on ebay. In the winter I have an SRT loaded with HP5 @ 400, one with HP5 @ 1600, one with Delta 3200. Sometimes one with Pan F if I want to go tripod shooting. I must admit though, lately I have started to get a soft spot for Nikkormat FTN's.

[Nokton48]

Originally Posted by 21-135 Apo All Good

The SRM had an electronic release built into the motor. One of his favorite lenses was an old preset Sun Optical 70-210 F4.8 with pistol grip. You squeezed the pistol grip to stop the lens down just prior to the shutter firing and a plunger made out of a common nail came out the back of the pistol grip just far enough to push an electronic release button (mounted on a small piece of aluminum) that was plugged into the mini-jack on the motor. Quite ingenious yet simple design that always worked. Enabled you to follow-focus or zoom as you took photos at 3 FPS! High School football never looked so good! Motorized "strips" of a QB handing-off to a Running Back were the norm instead of the exception! He used to tape the cropped vertical 1/2 frame images together with scotch tape and the Sports Editor would run them 3 or 4 columns wide by 5 or 6 inches deep, sometimes more! That rig of his was smaller & lighter than a Nikon F with cordless F-36 motor or a Canon F-1 with either of the two motors available for it. Metering was never a problem, his Luna-Pro did just fine! He used to rate Tri-X at 800 ASA and develope it in Ethol UFG for 7.5 minutes @ 70 degrees. By todays' standards the zoom wasn't the sharpest in the world, but I wish I still had it as it's use created thousands of published photos in the Home News of New Brunswick, NJ. Sadly it perished in a house fire after his passing.Dave

Hi Dave,
Nice story about the SRM. Honestly I have not met many people who have actually owned and used one. Here is another SRM story: I met Fred DeVan on another photo userforum, and he was very excited and enthusiastic that I was interested in the SRM, and had just purchased one. Back when I was shooting High School Football games and other photojournalism, I had -never- seen the SRM, only read about it in detail, from Joseph Cooper's giant Minolta SRT Handbook. There is an entire chapter dedicated to the SRM, and it goes into great detail about the camera and it's use.

Anyway, Fred DeVan was (is) a photographer for LIFE Magazine, and a Photo Editor and Photographer for ROAD&TRACK Magazines for many years, and was a devoted user of the SRM. He told me a story, about how he photographed Sly Stone's wedding, which was held in Madison Square Garden, for LIFE Magazine. With the help of multiple assistants, he mounted four motorized SRM cameras into the ceiling rigging of the Garden, each camera equipped with a 250 exposure back, and a Minolta Intervalometer. So he was getting a remote shot from each camera, every few seconds. The assistant's job was to keep the cameras freshly loaded, and running. The pictures were published in LIFE.

Fred was very helpful is telling me what parts to look out for, but frankly they have not real easy to find in my experience. SRM's probably end up in the hands of camera collectors, which is sort of a shame, if they're not using them IMO.

Anyway, I hope Fred is still around and doing well. Would love to talk to him again.

[Nokton48]

Originally Posted by Fawley

I'm sure you'll love it. Its a very nice camera to use. The only problem is, sometimes I baby it too much. I don't use it much in the winter time, but then I have all those SRT 101's that I was picking up for a while whenever one went for a ridiculously low price on ebay. In the winter I have an SRT loaded with HP5 @ 400, one with HP5 @ 1600, one with Delta 3200. Sometimes one with Pan F if I want to go tripod shooting.

That's exactly how I use my SRT's. I keep two loaded with slow film (Panatomic-X, Ilford Pan F, Efke 25), two with medium speed (Eastman 5222 Double-X Movie Film, Tri-X, or Presto Fuji400) and two with highspeed film (Presto Fuji 1600 or Ilfrd Delta3200).

It's a real pleasure to have so many multiple bodies. I keep them always loaded, just grab whatever is appropriate, for the prevailing weather conditions, and the type of work that I am intending to do. These have not let me down, and I certainly don't "baby" them.

Have you ever had any problems with the "Sensiswitch" on the front of the XK? Another friend told he they thought the XK was "clumsy" compared to the XE-7, the Sensiswitch was problematic. Of course, a CLA would probably solve that problem.

[Roscoe]

Originally Posted by 21-135 Apo All Good

I've discovered I made a slight mistake:

The Sun Optical Zoom lens is 85-210 F4.8, not 70-210. Sorry for the confusion. Found one today on ebay for $65.00 with Nikon T-mount. The pistol grip isn't an accessory, it's part of the preset diaphragm system. Part of what makes this piece of glass very unique.

Dave

Well, I got curious and dug out the lens from behind a small sea of lenses. I guess I was confused as well. It is indeed the 85-210/4.8 you mention, but does not have the pistol grip. Rather a tripod collar that made me think of the grip version that I saw searching for info. I now remember picking it up on a whim from the local Goodwill because I liked the feel of it and with the simple, smooth, 1/4 turn zoom lever, and well damped focus, it would make a fun video lens for my Canon 7D. And mine is a T mount with a Minolta bayonet. Maybe I should get a Canon T mount adapter and try it out.

[21-135 Apo All Good]

Originally Posted by Roscoe

Well, I got curious and dug out the lens from behind a small sea of lenses. I guess I was confused as well. It is indeed the 85-210/4.8 you mention, but does not have the pistol grip. Rather a tripod collar that made me think of the grip version that I saw searching for info. I now remember picking it up on a whim from the local Goodwill because I liked the feel of it and with the simple, smooth, 1/4 turn zoom lever, and well damped focus, it would make a fun video lens for my Canon 7D. And mine is a T mount with a Minolta bayonet. Maybe I should get a Canon T mount adapter and try it out.

Roscoe,

It couldn't hurt to try it out! Just remember it's NOT Zeiss glass, so the use of the hard metal lens hood (that came with the optic) is very helpful in combating flare and chromatic aberrations.

One other thing you'll notice is that once you focus the lens at 210mm, it WILL stay sharp as you zoom it all of the way down to 85mm! Dad was very proud of that and credited same as helping him get some of those great High school sports moments on film!

Thanks for writing & good luck with the lens!

Dave

[21-135 Apo All Good]

Originally Posted by Nokton48

Hi Dave,
Nice story about the SRM. Honestly I have not met many people who have actually owned and used one. Here is another SRM story: I met Fred DeVan on another photo userforum, and he was very excited and enthusiastic that I was interested in the SRM, and had just purchased one. Back when I was shooting High School Football games and other photojournalism, I had -never- seen the SRM, only read about it in detail, from Joseph Cooper's giant Minolta SRT Handbook. There is an entire chapter dedicated to the SRM, and it goes into great detail about the camera and it's use.

Anyway, Fred DeVan was (is) a photographer for LIFE Magazine, and a Photo Editor and Photographer for ROAD&TRACK Magazines for many years, and was a devoted user of the SRM. He told me a story, about how he photographed Sly Stone's wedding, which was held in Madison Square Garden, for LIFE Magazine. With the help of multiple assistants, he mounted four motorized SRM cameras into the ceiling rigging of the Garden, each camera equipped with a 250 exposure back, and a Minolta Intervalometer. So he was getting a remote shot from each camera, every few seconds. The assistant's job was to keep the cameras freshly loaded, and running. The pictures were published in LIFE.

Fred was very helpful is telling me what parts to look out for, but frankly they have not real easy to find in my experience. SRM's probably end up in the hands of camera collectors, which is sort of a shame, if they're not using them IMO.

Anyway, I hope Fred is still around and doing well. Would love to talk to him again.

Terrific SRM story! Sounds like Fred knew John Johnny too! Might have even borrowed some stuff from him (the Intervolometer) to do that shoot! The mini-jack on the SRM bodies were quite state of the art back then. As I recall not too many motorized cameras had the ability to be driven unmanned (without modification). That was also one of their selling points, and probably why Fred chose them for that assignment! Again a delightful story, and thanks for sharing!

More Newspaper history:

Back when Dad had his SRM (in the 70's) there were a select few fellow Newspaper Photogs that even owned motordrives. In the late 70's that began to change. The Paper my Dad worked for then chose to discontinue the "Camera Allowance" monthly reimbursement paid to the Staff Photographers and opted to purchase each Staffer a mini Nikon system consisting of a F-2, a Nikkormat ELW with 2FPS winder, as well as a 35 F1.4, 105 F2.5, 180 F2.8 ED and other various Nikkor lenses. If memory serves correctly, the Paper bought ONE Motor Drive for all of the F-2 bodies among the guys to share. So that SRM still received some use!

Then Dad retired and it was my turn to use it. Oh the memories! And those Rokkor lenses were quite decent as I recall. Lots of newspaper Photogs used Minoltas and proudly so! They were never regarded as a "******* Step-Child" as some may think. Instead they were looked upon as a friend, a workhorse that could always be counted upon to get "THE SHOT"!

Dave

[Fawley]

Originally Posted by Nokton48

Have you ever had any problems with the "Sensiswitch" on the front of the XK? Another friend told he they thought the XK was "clumsy" compared to the XE-7, the Sensiswitch was problematic. Of course, a CLA would probably solve that problem.

I have read Internet reviews that criticise the sensiswitch. I have never had a problem with mine and I find it a useful feature. It well placed to activate easily while shooting. I like it because I can leave the power switch turned off if I want to walk around with the lense cap off. That way the meter isn't being constantly activated and there is less battery drain. If I want to take a shot, I just press the switch on the front of the body while shooting. This will only work in manual metering mode however. In automatic mode you must have the power switch turned on.
I have an XE-7 as well and I prefer useing the XK, primarily due to the light meter display in the XE7 which I don't like as well. I do prefer the smaller size of the XE7, but you have to sacrifice something to get the great options of the XK. The shutter on my XK also feels smoother than the XE7. I have no problem at all useing the XK at 1/15 sec. I did buy a new AE finder for my XK because I found that the aperture window in the viewfinder wasn't well illuminated in my old one. That may be something to watch out for.