Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > The Business Of Photography

The Business Of Photography This is the place to ask questions about the business of being a photographer -- including but not limited to business set up, marketing, copyright, and the ever popular how much to charge.

Thread Tools Display Modes

meanwhile at Getty...
Old 11-19-2011   #1
Registered User
emraphoto's Avatar
emraphoto is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,122
meanwhile at Getty...


Getty Cuts Pay for Editorial Contributors

Getty has announced a take-it-or-leave-it rate cut for its editorial contributors under a new contract that specifies 35 percent royalties for all sales. Under current contracts that will soon expire, Getty pays photographers 50 percent for some sales, and 35 percent for others.

Photographers who don’t sign the contract will be terminated when their current contracts expire.

The agency notified photographers of the changes on November 9, giving them 30 days to sign the new contract. The agency told photographers that the new contract terms will enable Getty “to more easily modify content use across more and new license models, products, services and selling environments, including subscriptions, high-volume customer deals and new or emerging pricing, licensing and payment models.”

In other words, customers will be paying less for images in some cases. By cutting photographers’ rates, Getty will be able to offer images at lower prices with less negative impact on its own bottom line.

Asked whether Getty has found itself unable to compete for low-priced business without asking for concessions from suppliers, agency spokesperson Jodi Einhorn said, “No….[W]e are developing new ways for customers to use more of our content and as a result, new ways to pay contributors must be created in these situations.”

One way photographers benefit from the new contract, Getty says in the November 9 memo, is that photographers will now be paid in 60 days rather than 120 days. Einhorn also told PDN that Getty is “making changes and improvements around how we share and license our content, which will benefit our photographers,” by providing more exposure and more potential for sales of their images.

Einhorn did not say how many photographers are affected, or whether they are resisting the changes. But she did say, “It is totally normal for those affected to have questions. So we are responding to questions we receive and our team are always available to discuss any changes with our photographers, to help them understand these changes.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2011   #2
Registered User
charjohncarter's Avatar
charjohncarter is online now
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 6,412
Even the original deal didn't sound too good.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2011   #3
Roger Hicks
Registered User
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 20,122
As I recall, at law school this was defined as a contrat d'adhésion, aka 'take it or leave it', aka 'f*** you."

Fairness? Justice? The fact that picture libraries are essentially parasites on what the photographers create? Nah...


Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2011   #4
Registered User
emraphoto's Avatar
emraphoto is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,122
i think it was the latter of the three Roger. i wonder what Getty does when someone doesn't pay them for 4 months?
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-20-2011   #5
Registered User
lenicolas's Avatar
lenicolas is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3
Stinky process.
  Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 16:17.

vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.