Came back to film, possibly for 3 days.

Home

Forums

FAQ

Members List

		Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Film vs Digital
Came back to film, possibly for 3 days.

Film vs Digital Discussions about the relative advantages and disadvantages of Film vs Digital are important as they can help us understand our choices as photographers. Each medium has strengths and weaknesses which can best be used in a given circumstance. While this makes for an interesting and useful discussion, DO NOT attack others who disagree with you. Forum rules are explained in the RFF FAQ linked at the top of each page.

Thread Tools

Display Modes

06-06-2011	#21
rogerzilla Registered User rogerzilla is offline Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 993	My maths: Full frame body that can take my Leica lenses (well, some of them) - 5000 GBP. An M2 and M3 body - 1000 GBP 4000 GBP is an metric shedload of film and processing. It would keep me going for 20 years, during which time that M9 body would probably have been replaced three times. I can't cope with a crop factor; I like my 21mm lens to be a 21mm lens. Actually, if film vanished tomorrow, I'd join the masses and go back to horrible SLR kit like a Nikon D700, because new Leica is just too expensive. Last edited by rogerzilla : 06-06-2011 at 12:40.

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:06.

Mark Forums Read | View Forum Leaders