Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > SLRs - the unRF

SLRs - the unRF For those of you who must talk about SLRs, if only to confirm they are not RF.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Leica R collection - worth the bother?
Old 02-24-2011   #1
andreios
Registered User
 
andreios's Avatar
 
andreios is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 321
Question Leica R collection - worth the bother?

Friends,
I've been asked to "deal" with a sort of a collection of Leitz SLR items which comes from a deceased person. I know about the non-rangefinder leicas near to nothing, so forgive me for asking here - this is not meant as a pre-advertisment (though it might come to that), but just a way to learn a bit about what I've been offered.

The kit consists (as I was told - I still have my doubts whether to have all this kit shipped to me or not) of two bodies:

Leicaflex SL with Leitz 50mm/f2 lens
Leica R3 with 50mm/f 1.8 (was anything like f1.8 ever made by leitz?)

and a few additional lenses (not sure which versions these are):
Leitz 135mm f2,8
Leitz 250mm F4
Leitz 75-200mm f4,5

Are any of these lenses so good that it would be worth acquiring another system and keep it? I have to add that I am not much used to tele-photography.. Or are thay so good that they might be sell-able? If so, where could I find something like a price guide?

Thank you for any hints and advices.
__________________
My My Website

  Reply With Quote

Old 02-25-2011   #2
David Hughes
Registered User
 
David Hughes's Avatar
 
David Hughes is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,301
Hi,

The simple and short answer is "yes, yes and yes".

They are worth getting and using and should be easy to sell. All the lenses are to Leica's usual standard but you'd need to do some research on the web to get an idea of prices.

There's just one vague problem; if they fail they can be expensive to get repaired. The electronics, or rather replacing them, might make a repair difficult. BTW, failures are rare but you need to know before it happens. And in your country it may not be a problem.

In your shoes I would chase after them and use them. They are Leicas and nothing else need be said.

Regards, David
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-25-2011   #3
Dralowid
Michael
 
Dralowid's Avatar
 
Dralowid is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,145
The SL has something of a following. It is a simple camera and very good to use, if rather hefty. If you like Ms you will appreciate it's Leicaishness even though it is an SLR.

Early R3s can apparently have electronic issues and should be approached with caution.
__________________
I,II,III,SL,M6
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-25-2011   #4
dave lackey
Registered User
 
dave lackey's Avatar
 
dave lackey is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 6,703
Go for it! Rumors of bad electronics, etc. are exaggerated because in the beginning, it was a Minolta product, not Leica. After weeks of through research, I have zero problems in buying into the system!!! How many people who bitch about the problems actually owned one and HAD problems? Probably about the same as Nikon/Canon owners and I have had a few Nikon issues myself. Does'nt make me afraid to buy any more camera bodies.


Besides, Plan B is replacing an R body if it is a problem, buying another is VERY cheap and less than repair. Still much cheaper than the M system which I use every day!
__________________
Peace, Love and Happiness...



Dave

David Bryan

Blog and Documentary Updates
http://davidbryanlackey.blogspot.com/

Last edited by dave lackey : 02-25-2011 at 11:06.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-25-2011   #5
Steve M.
Registered User
 
Steve M. is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,988
The lenses are wonderful in terms of build quality and imagery, the 50 2.0 Summicron especially. Never heard of a 50 R 1.8 though.

I can't say the same for the cameras. They're a mixed bag, and the SL is a better one, but $25 will buy you a Nikon n8008s w/ great metering and all sorts of features. The Chinese copies of the Leitax lens mount adapters are about the same or less. You'll have to do stop down metering, but on the camera I mentioned the view is really bright at 2.0. Just focus at 2.0, close down the aperture, and the camera's shutter speeds will go in sync. Your metering will probably be off on a DSLR unless it's a newer, more expensive model. At least this is the case on the Canons. I wouldn't recommend a Canon film camera because of the off metering too. Best to go w/ an AF camera because w/ a split prism focus screen that's typically on a MF camera, the center gets dark as you stop down, throwing off the metering.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-25-2011   #6
andreios
Registered User
 
andreios's Avatar
 
andreios is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 321
Thanks meanwhile for your opinions.. I have to add, that I am not much interested in small format nowadays - so there is really no point for me to adapt those lenses on other than their proper bodies. Also no DLSR with me..

It turns out that the current holder wants/needs to get at least some money from the lot, so it seems I'll be able to keep at least one body and a pair of lenses (the SL with the summicron, most likely).

Anyway, I've made arrangements to get the lot into my hands and then I shall be wiser.. Hopefully..
__________________
My My Website

  Reply With Quote

Old 02-25-2011   #7
taskoni
Registered User
 
taskoni's Avatar
 
taskoni is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 2,000
Go for it!
__________________
When in doubt, click.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-29-2011   #8
andreios
Registered User
 
andreios's Avatar
 
andreios is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 321
It has taken a while to get the collection SAFELY home from Italy, but I picked it up over the weekend and went through it last night - there are some nice cameras and lenses there.
Both the SL and R3 with their respecitve 50mm Summicrons, a couple of Leitz R tele lenses and one that I never saw or heard about before - a HUGE piece of glass - Sigmatel YS 135mm f1,8 - anyone heard about that?

Now I have to test the gear - which is always quite a happy "duty" and it'll be an enjoyable change from weeks (months?) of LF and MF shooting :-)


Thanks!
__________________
My My Website

  Reply With Quote

Old 05-30-2011   #9
David Hughes
Registered User
 
David Hughes's Avatar
 
David Hughes is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,301
Great! And many thanks for the feedback. I'm looking forward to your next report.

Regards, David

PS It might be worthwhile to mention anything that's missing, like lens or body caps. Most of us have a few odds and ends that are looking for a good home and that don't justify advertising or putting on ebay...
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-30-2011   #10
andreios
Registered User
 
andreios's Avatar
 
andreios is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 321
Thanks, David! I have to go through it carefully and find what's what - also there are some weird adapters for visoflex etc... But it cerainly promises a lot of fun for coming weeks
__________________
My My Website

  Reply With Quote

Old 04-06-2013   #11
asiafish
Registered User
 
asiafish is offline
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 13
I'm a big fan of the R3 and the 135 Elmarit-R.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 20:56.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.