| Optics Theory - This forum is aimed towards the TECHNICAL side of photographic OPTICS THEORY. There will be some overlap by camera/manufacturer, but this forum is for the heavy duty tech discussions. This is NOT the place to discuss a specific lens or lens line, do that in the appropriate forum. This is the forum to discuss optics or lenses in general, to learn about the tech behind the lenses and images. IF you have a question about a specific lens, post it in the forum about that type of camera, NOT HERE. |
05-08-2010
|
#26
|
|
Registered User
Debusti Paolo is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 563
|
not a lens....but a 903swc camera...
|
|
|
|
05-09-2010
|
#27
|
|
Registered User
johannielscom is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,345
|
On a number of occasionsI have decieed on a bad looking lens when in the market for one. I shoot street and prefer using gear then thats looking harmless, old and abused
|
|
|
|
05-09-2010
|
#28
|
|
Registered User
FrankHarries is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 309
|
I buy ALL my photo gear because its good looking  ! And when I walk around in the streets it really suits me and I look good too! Too bad, that my pictures don't look as good as my lenses do  !
|
|
|
|
05-09-2010
|
#29
|
|
Jan Bielikowski
jbielikowski is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 1,016
|
Well, all my film cameras got female alias, no doubt that they must look good  I've sold them recently but Zuiko lenses and OM-1 were bought to be beautiful.
__________________

|
|
|
|
05-09-2010
|
#30
|
|
良かったね!
flip is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kobe, Japan
Posts: 1,226
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbielikowski
Well, all my film cameras got female alias, no doubt that they must look good  I've sold them recently but Zuiko lenses and OM-1 were bought to be beautiful.
|
Your mentioning this reminds me of what an ex (a Japanese photog) said when I first hunted for an Olympus Pen F(V). She said they were well known as the "girl's camera" because of the nice looks.
Well, she's gone, but I still have the FV.
__________________
Very happy with my Shintaro BP M2. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
05-09-2010
|
#31
|
|
Registered User
Turtle is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,470
|
Nope. Its an interesting concept. I have always found the company of beautiful women infinitely more pleasurable. My cameras are for taking photographs!
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1543'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
05-09-2010
|
#32
|
|
Registered User
paulfish4570 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On the Locust Fork of the Warrior River, Alabama
Age: 62
Posts: 16,120
|
I admit a longing for CZJ zebra normal lens in M42. I have no need for it ...
__________________
Paul
i seek to photograph the things not seen.
" ... faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen." Hebrews 11-1
"One eye sees. The other eye feels." - Paul Klee
"... For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal." - apostle Paul, 2 Corinthians, 4:18
"Film will only become art when it's materials are as inexpensive as pencil and paper." - Jean Cocteau
http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
05-09-2010
|
#33
|
|
Moderator
jsrockit is online now
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,935
|
NO, never based solely on looks, but aesthetics do come into play for me...
|
|
|
|
05-23-2010
|
#34
|
|
E. D. Russell Roberts
Ezzie is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,999
|
Yes and no. I´ve a VC 35f/1.2 on loan, and I can´t bring myself to put it on the R-D1. The R-D1 isn´t the smallest of RFs, but that lens is a monster, I use the VC 35/f1.4 instead. The 28/f1.9 is nearly as big as the bigger 35, but just small enough to handle well on the camera.
When looking for a compact 90 in the f2-4 range I ended up with the Konica M-Hexanon 90/f2.8 as a result of good write-ups, but also due to its good looks and compact good build.
__________________
Eirik
RF: Leica M4-2 | Royal 35-M | Polaroid Land 250 | Polaroid 110A/600SE hybrid
VF: DIY 4x5 | DIY 6x17 | Voigtländer Vito CL | Foth Derby | Welta Weltix
SLR: Kowa Super 66 | Pentax SP1000
TLR: Rolleiflex 2.8E3 | Flexaret Va | Kalloflex K2
CSC: Fuji X-E1
My Flickr
Silver Halides - Pictures in B&W
My homepage
|
|
|
|
05-23-2010
|
#35
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,929
|
I have never bought a lens for its looks.
I have been interested in some women over the years because of their looks.
I married my wife because of who she was.
I agree with the SWC choice ....
|
|
|
|
05-23-2010
|
#36
|
|
eclipse
robklurfield is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 15,002
|
if it weren't for the fact that I ALSO like the way it performs and that its small size is very handy, I might lump my 35/3.5 Summaron in this category.
It's smaller than the Kobalux VF on the M8 in the background.
Lousy image courtesy a 10-yr old Leica/Fuji Digizoom.
|
|
|
|
05-23-2010
|
#37
|
|
shooter of stuff
tbarker13 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,142
|
Hmm. I did just recently buy a 40 summicron because I wanted a small lens to plop on my M8 when I want to travel light.
Of course, I wouldn't have purchased it if I weren't also convinced that it is a great lens.
|
|
|
|
05-24-2010
|
#38
|
|
Olav
Olav Kettner is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 11
|
Yes, i did. A Summarit 1,5/50mm.
Greetings
Olav
|
|
|
|
05-24-2010
|
#39
|
|
Invisible Cities
Lauffray is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montreal
Age: 25
Posts: 470
|
Wait, you mean ugly lenses take pictures too?
|
|
|
|
05-24-2010
|
#40
|
|
Registered User
David Hegar is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Kansas City, USA
Age: 42
Posts: 62
|
I fortunately never considered buying a lens just because it looked good. And I consider myself very-very lucky to have that line of thought.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:39. |
|
|