Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > TLR Forum - Twin Lens Reflex

TLR Forum - Twin Lens Reflex another alternative to the dreaded SLR way of seeing, this forum for all format TLR cameras

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Rollinar type lens
Old 12-28-2009   #26
Richard DeYoung
Registered User
 
Richard DeYoung is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Trinity, TexAS
Posts: 3
Rollinar type lens

[UI have a complete set of Vivitar Oarallax correcting closeup sets for a bay 1 lens. they are as follows:
Number 1 permits focusing from 39 to18 inches
Number 2 permits focusing from 18 to 13 inches
Number 3 permits forucing from 13 to 8 inches.
The last time I used them was about 3 years ago and they worked fine.
Will sell the whole set including the leather cases (3) and the instructions for $50.00
Richard DeYoung
rcd7112@windstream.net
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-28-2009   #27
wallace
wallace
 
wallace's Avatar
 
wallace is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 393
$50 is a fantastic price! I had to pay more for my set...

wallace
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-28-2009   #28
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
I have the three Rolleinars for the 2.8 models, but I hardly evry use these optics. This thread has encouraged me to put them to use.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-29-2009   #29
uhligfd
Registered User
 
uhligfd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 537
The Rolleinar are diopters that correspond to their index or number:
Rolleinar 1 = 1 diopter, i.e. the infinity focus is shifted to 1/1 meter = 100 cm; the Rolleinar 2 is a 2 diopter lens, so the infinity focus point is shifted to 1/2 meter = 50 cm. And for the Rolleinar 3, infinity shifts to 1/ ... well, did you get the simple math? --- to 1/? meter (Solution 1/3 meter = 33 cm).

And since the Rolleis have a closest focus distance of 1 meter (= 1 diopter), the Rolleinar 1 will focus down to 1 + 1 diopter (Lens full extension plus Rolleinar 1 diopter addition) = 2 diopters or focusing from 1 m to 50 cm.
The Rolleinar 2 from 1/2 (50 cm) to 1/(2+1) = 1/3 meter= 33 cm (2 diopters from the Rolleinar 2 plus the 1 from lens board extension).

And the Rolleinar 3 from 1/3 m to 1/4 m = 25 cm.

Now you can also add two diopters such as the 1 and 2 to get object distances from the front of the lens between 1/(1+2) to 1/(1+1+2) meters or from 1/3 m = 33 cm to 1/4 m = 25 cm etc.

Diopter arithmetic is so simple! The prismas on the viewing lens will line up and there is much fun to be had here. Enjoy!

Minimal object distance from front of lens with all 3 Rolleinars is 1/(1+1+2+3) = 1/7 m = 14 cm. With an 8 cm (80 mm) lens that is almost a 1:1.6 reduction and produces an image of a size 9 by 9 cm square in reality on the MF film.
  Reply With Quote

Is this the correct set up for the Rolleinar 3-piece sets?
Old 05-02-2010   #30
ellisson
Registered User
 
ellisson's Avatar
 
ellisson is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Elkins Park, PA
Posts: 562
Question Is this the correct set up for the Rolleinar 3-piece sets?

I just acquired Rolleinar 1 and 2 sets. Each set has 3 parts: A prism with the black rim, and two identical thinner lenses, which I assume are the diopters. I think one of the diopters needs to be attached in front of the prism on the viewing lens, and the other diopter goes on the taking lens. Is this the correct set up? Thanks!
__________________
flickrgallery
Pbase gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-02-2010   #31
Nathan67
Registered User
 
Nathan67 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellisson View Post
I just acquired Rolleinar 1 and 2 sets. Each set has 3 parts: A prism with the black rim, and two identical thinner lenses, which I assume are the diopters. I think one of the diopters needs to be attached in front of the prism on the viewing lens, and the other diopter goes on the taking lens. Is this the correct set up? Thanks!
Yes, you need one Rolleinar on the taking lens and one on the viewing lens, in addition on the viewing lens you need the Rolleiparkeil (prism). be sure to orientate the red dot on the prism at the top...

Really easy to use.. enjoy!

Nathan
__________________
Graflex Crown Graphic--Rolleiflex MX-EVS--RolleicordVa--Fuji GW645i--Bessa RF folder--Fuji Klasse W--RicohGR1s... etc etc etc....
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-02-2010   #32
Nathan67
Registered User
 
Nathan67 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 34
oh , I see that you ask if the diopter goes in front of the prism.. no its the other way around... the diopter on the viewing lens first, then the prism...
__________________
Graflex Crown Graphic--Rolleiflex MX-EVS--RolleicordVa--Fuji GW645i--Bessa RF folder--Fuji Klasse W--RicohGR1s... etc etc etc....
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-02-2010   #33
ellisson
Registered User
 
ellisson's Avatar
 
ellisson is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Elkins Park, PA
Posts: 562
Nathan,
Yes, that is what I meant, first the rolleinar, then prism on the viewing lens.

Thank you for clarifying this! Now to try it out!

Gary
__________________
flickrgallery
Pbase gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-03-2010   #34
jbielikowski
Jan Bielikowski
 
jbielikowski's Avatar
 
jbielikowski is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 1,012
Could anybody can help me to indetify with bayonet got my rolleiflex? According to serial number and appearance it should be 3.5 C, it has Tessar lens, so it should be bay I, but I'm not sure. Here's the picture of it.

__________________

  Reply With Quote

Old 05-03-2010   #35
Wayno
Registered User
 
Wayno is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 285
Your Rolleiflex seems quite unusual. If it has a Tessar lens it should be bay 1, but your camera shares some characteristics with the 3.5E model (which were fitted with Planar/Xenotar lenses and are bay 2 size). It has the nameplate and strap hangers of the 3.5E model, and the bayonet size and spacing also looks to be the same as the 3.5E. I mightn't be remembering all of this correctly, but it does seem a bit weird to me.
__________________
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2010   #36
rolleistef
Registered User
 
rolleistef's Avatar
 
rolleistef is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Paris (France, not Texas!)
Posts: 930
It definitevely is a 3.5C, have a look at camera #27 on that page :
http://www.rolleiclub.com/cameras/tl.../all_TLR.shtml

Then Bayonet 1, as for any 3.5 tessar!
__________________
Stéphane
Rolleiflex T, Rolleicord Art Déco, sweet Minolta XD5, dead XGM, X300 and X700 ; Hi-Matic F, Hi-Matic 9, Pentax SP1000 and K20D
My Flickr


RFF EuroMeet 2010-Florence !!!
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2010   #37
Wayno
Registered User
 
Wayno is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 285
That's right, I'd forgotten that the 3.5E is also known as the 3.5C. But... it should have a Planar/Xenotar and be bay 2 shouldn't it? The MX-EVS (or K4B - camera number 8 on that Rolleiclub link) is similar and has a Tessar (or Xenar) lens, but as I mentioned it has a different nameplate, strap hangers, etc.

Did any of the 3.5C/3.5E's come with a Tessar from the factory?
__________________
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2010   #38
jbielikowski
Jan Bielikowski
 
jbielikowski's Avatar
 
jbielikowski is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 1,012
Thank guys, I wasnt sure what rolleiclub shows because with the 3.5C they have spec of 2.8 version. the list of serial numbers also wasnt unanimous, one say 3.5C and two 3.5E. Wayno it's making photos and that's most important
__________________

  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2010   #39
Wayno
Registered User
 
Wayno is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 285
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbielikowski View Post
Wayno it's making photos and that's most important


Yes, correct. I suspect that the Tessar has been retrofitted to your camera. As long as it's been correctly installed that's all that matters. If you want Rolleinars, a lens cap or a lens hood I suspect that bay 2 will be the correct size, but it would pay to measure or try before you buy.
__________________
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-13-2010   #40
anglophone1
Astounded of Antibes
 
anglophone1's Avatar
 
anglophone1 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Antibes, France
Posts: 256
http://www.photoshelter.com/c/clive_...00OZimsIrQAq0/

Rolleiflex 2.8 [same age as me] with rolleinar
All shot during a transatlantic voyage aboard "Seabourn Spirit" during November 2009.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-13-2010   #41
Wayno
Registered User
 
Wayno is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 285
Great series Clive!
__________________
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-13-2010   #42
Mudman
Registered User
 
Mudman's Avatar
 
Mudman is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 948
With the Walz version of the Rolleinar



__________________
"Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships."
~Ansel Adams
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-25-2010   #43
jbielikowski
Jan Bielikowski
 
jbielikowski's Avatar
 
jbielikowski is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 1,012
Rolleinar 2 with bay I just arrived... and now I know 3.5 C does not have bay I, Tessar was misleading. Nevertheless 15mins and some cardboard made it fit.
__________________

  Reply With Quote

Old 05-25-2010   #44
Wayno
Registered User
 
Wayno is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 285
Aha, so it is bay 2. I was pretty sure that you're camera would originally have been fitted with a Planar or Xenotar. It sounds like you've used a bit of ingenuity to make the bay 1 Rolleinar fit.
__________________
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-27-2010   #45
MISH
Registered User
 
MISH's Avatar
 
MISH is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 406
my rollinar set #1 bay 1 does not have one that is thicker than the other both are the same ...did they ever come from Rollei like this or did someone put two of the taking filters together (it did come in a nice Rollie case)
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-28-2010   #46
Thomas78
Registered User
 
Thomas78 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Düren, Germany
Age: 34
Posts: 601
There are two different versions available.
The older version consist of two rolleinar, one for each lens and a "rolleiparkeil" (a prism) for parallax compensation, so there are three pieces.

The more modern version has a rolleinar for the taking lens and a combination of the prism and a rolleinar in one piece, the "Heidosmat-Rolleinar" for the viewing lens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-31-2010   #47
Darkhorse
pointed and shot
 
Darkhorse's Avatar
 
Darkhorse is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 829
I've been out with the Autocord today in an effort to alleviate desires for other MF systems. I ended up on the coast again (because I didn't want to pay $15 to park where I wanted to go) and I used my Rolleinar 2 a fair bit. I thought I'd post them here to help give an idea of what they can do. They're tremendously helpful and make a TLR a lot more versatile.

Excuse the size. Hey, it's medium format. Big negs rule. TMAX 100 in HC110 Dil B.



This one is cropped a bit as well:

  Reply With Quote

Old 03-09-2011   #48
froyd
Registered User
 
froyd's Avatar
 
froyd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 901
According to the Rolleinar DOF char, at 19 3/4" it seems like I would need f11 to have 3" focus zone (enough fot tip of the nose to back of eye socket). Are all those gorgeous rolleinar portraits I see on the web really shot at f11 of greater?
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-12-2011   #49
Costo Kim
Registered User
 
Costo Kim is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 61
rolleinar I on rolleiflex 2.8c plarar


201004-203-rollei28c-400tx-00 by Costo, on Flickr
__________________
Flickr Streetcorn Seencere
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-12-2011   #50
Spavinaw
Registered User
 
Spavinaw is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Rocket City
Posts: 297
For those using Rolleinars or similar devices, heed Wayno's words, "What you see on the ground glass is not exactly what you get on film". I was doing a product shot with colored paper background. Everything looked good in the finder when I took the shot, but when the film was developed I found that the taking lens lens was looking slightly above the background paper. Bummer as it was a slide. Remember this, parallax is only corrected at the point of focus. This is true with any parallax correcting finder, not just TLR's. However, there is a cure for this. A Paramender or similar device is a short pole that mounts between a TLR and a tripod. The length of the pole can be changed a distance just equal to the distance between the centers of the taking lens and viewing lens. First compose the picture with the camera in the lower position. Then raise the camera to the upper position. Now the taking lens is exactly where the viewing lens was, and it will take exactly what the viewing lens saw!
__________________
Are we having fun yet?
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Using Rolleinar 2 on Rollei 3.5F leica M2 fan TLR Forum - Twin Lens Reflex 12 04-29-2010 16:18



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:38.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.