| Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" Discussions about the Leica M8 /M 8.2 / M9 / M9-P/ M-E / M Monochrom / M10 aka "M": Leica digital M mount rangefinder cameras. Naming the new digital M the "Leica M" is VERY unfortunate as it will only confuse newbies with other Leica M cameras of the the past. Happily there is room for confusion with only the past 59 years of Leica M production ... since Leica introduced the Leica M system in 1953. All Hail for the Leica Marketing Department learning Leica M history! |
 |
75mm summarit problem? |
 |
12-05-2009
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
woodleica is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Puget Sound, USA
Posts: 93
|
75mm summarit problem?
Hey guys, I've never seen anything quite like this before. This looks likes purple fringing. Is it the lens, the sensor or what? Shot with my new M8 and 75mm summarit lens. I'm not using a UVIR filter. Also, I don't have a lens hood yet ( on order ). Any input appreciated. Attached is shot and 100% crop of an area. Also, I had looked at Sean Reids review of the lens before purchasing, and now that I look again, notice that the chromatic aberration portion of the review is missing.
Last edited by woodleica : 12-06-2009 at 08:44.
|
|
|
|
12-05-2009
|
#2
|
|
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
payasam is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Delhi, India
Age: 62
Posts: 4,860
|
No lens should do this. Know nothing about the M8.
__________________
"Payasam" means a sloppy pudding. Little kids love it, and I'm a little kid with a big grey beard and diabetes.
Film: M6, M2, Ultron 35/1.7, M-Hexanon 50/2,Elmarit 90/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5, Canon 100/3.5, Jupiter 8
Digital: Olympus E-300, E-510 and E-3 with 4 Zuiko Digital lenses
RFF gallery
Flickr gallery
|
|
|
|
12-05-2009
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
35mmdelux is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,210
|
try the IR filter to eliminate this problem -
__________________
Canon 5d MKII : 35mm f.1.4L
M7 : 35 Summilux : 50 Summilux
|
|
|
|
12-06-2009
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
f 1,0 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 27
|
i think you use Lightroom
try Capture One, it can reduce the purple fringing
|
|
|
|
12-06-2009
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
swoop is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York City
Age: 30
Posts: 1,559
|
I'd guess UVIR filter is the solution.
|
|
|
|
12-06-2009
|
#6
|
|
-
Fujitsu is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 289
|
Pretty normal.
|
|
|
|
12-06-2009
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
woodleica is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Puget Sound, USA
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by payasam
No lens should do this. Know nothing about the M8.
|
I agree with you which is why I was asking
|
|
|
|
12-06-2009
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
woodleica is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Puget Sound, USA
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fujitsu
Pretty normal.
|
Can you explain what you mean by "pretty normal" ?
|
|
|
|
12-06-2009
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
fbf is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,266
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodleica
Can you explain what you mean by "pretty normal" ?
|
"normal" output directly from m8 w/o using uv/ir filters. Try uv/ir filters like people have mentioned above, see if there is any improvement.
|
|
|
|
12-06-2009
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
woodleica is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Puget Sound, USA
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by f 1,0
i think you use Lightroom
try Capture One, it can reduce the purple fringing
|
Thanks, I know software can help and that's not my issue, I'm more concerned about the lens exhibiting this in a situation like this. It should NOT happen.
|
|
|
|
12-06-2009
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
woodleica is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Puget Sound, USA
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fbf
"normal" output directly from m8 w/o using uv/ir filters. Try uv/ir filters like people have mentioned above, see if there is any improvement.
|
I had not thought this to be an IR issue and it looks like you are saying it is. I am still waiting for my IR filter to arrive so until then, I cannot try it out, and also, I have to hope for another sunny day in Seattle in winter. 
|
|
|
|
12-06-2009
|
#12
|
|
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
payasam is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Delhi, India
Age: 62
Posts: 4,860
|
"I'm more concerned about the lens exhibiting this...".
You shouldn't blame the lens unless other lenses don't do this.
__________________
"Payasam" means a sloppy pudding. Little kids love it, and I'm a little kid with a big grey beard and diabetes.
Film: M6, M2, Ultron 35/1.7, M-Hexanon 50/2,Elmarit 90/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5, Canon 100/3.5, Jupiter 8
Digital: Olympus E-300, E-510 and E-3 with 4 Zuiko Digital lenses
RFF gallery
Flickr gallery
|
|
|
|
12-06-2009
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
woodleica is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Puget Sound, USA
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by payasam
"I'm more concerned about the lens exhibiting this...".
You shouldn't blame the lens unless other lenses don't do this.
|
Depends on your point of view - you could then blame all the lenses. However, to add I would like to think that I am not "blaming" the lens at all. I have observed an issue and would like input from the experts on this issue.
Last edited by woodleica : 12-06-2009 at 10:17.
|
|
|
|
12-06-2009
|
#14
|
|
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
payasam is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Delhi, India
Age: 62
Posts: 4,860
|
I meant the known facts, woodleica, not anyone's point of view. If similar photos taken with other lenses show the same effect, then indeed one could blame all lenses. However, that would involve standing the science of optics on its head. If you have used only the 75mm on the M8, you do not know enough to come to any conclusion and it would be best to stick to the filter hypothesis for the present.
__________________
"Payasam" means a sloppy pudding. Little kids love it, and I'm a little kid with a big grey beard and diabetes.
Film: M6, M2, Ultron 35/1.7, M-Hexanon 50/2,Elmarit 90/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5, Canon 100/3.5, Jupiter 8
Digital: Olympus E-300, E-510 and E-3 with 4 Zuiko Digital lenses
RFF gallery
Flickr gallery
|
|
|
|
12-07-2009
|
#15
|
|
RFF Sponsoring Member.
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 7,201
|
It is not the IR filter, it is not chromatic aberration and it is not sensor blooming, although all those factors can intensify the effect . It is an effect of high contrast edges in RAW conversion. ACR (Lightroom) is notorious in this repect. The best conversion software I kinow for this is C1 5.0.1 with purple defringing swiched on.
The problem is that in demosaicing the near-100% contrast jump from one pixel to the next screws up the Bayer colour interpolation, and as green is the most number of sites it shows up as magenta. The severity depends on the demosaicing algorithms. Perversely, the better the lens and the sharper (no AA filter) the sensor, the worse the problem. I usually lasso the problem areas and desaturate magenta, if the RAW conversion cannot cope.
Last edited by jaapv : 12-07-2009 at 03:02.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
12-07-2009
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
woodleica is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Puget Sound, USA
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaapv
It is not the IR filter, it is not chromatic aberration and it is not sensor blooming, although all those factors can intensify the effect . It is an effect of high contrast edges in RAW conversion. ACR (Lightroom) is notorious in this repect. The best conversion software I kinow for this is C1 5.0.1 with purple defringing swiched on.
The problem is that in demosaicing the near-100% contrast jump from one pixel to the next screws up the Bayer colour interpolation, and as green is the most number of sites it shows up as magenta. The severity depends on the demosaicing algorithms. Perversely, the better the lens and the sharper (no AA filter) the sensor, the worse the problem. I usually lasso the problem areas and desaturate magenta, if the RAW conversion cannot cope.
|
Ahh, THAT makes sense - thank you. It's been a while since I read about RAW conversion. I'm assuming then that RAW images from the Foveon don't suffer from this since interpolation isn't needed.
|
|
|
|
 |
12-07-2009
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
f 1,0 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by f 1,0
i think you use Lightroom
try Capture One, it can reduce the purple fringing
|
???????????
|
|
|
|
12-07-2009
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
woodleica is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Puget Sound, USA
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by f 1,0
???????????
|
You had the solution right and but I was responding to understanding the cause in the earlier mail - i.e that it's a problem with RAW conversion, not the lens or the sensor. Having understood that, clearly the solution you prescribed earlier is correct. I don't like applying solutions without knowing the cause. 
|
|
|
|
12-09-2009
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
ruslan is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 173
|
Yes, it is purple fringing and it is normal for no AA, pretty easy fix in any RAW converter, but why no ir/cut filter? But, Ir/cut filter will not fix fringing though, only software.
Last edited by ruslan : 12-09-2009 at 06:35.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 22:47. |
|
|