Which Dev. for least base fog ???
Old 10-09-2009   #1
Steve Karr
Film tank shaker
 
Steve Karr's Avatar
 
Steve Karr is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 246
Which Dev. for least base fog ???

Hi everyone,

Ok so I bought 1000' of Plus X (09/2003) from evil-bay a while back and shot a roll & souped it in Diafine. (quick & dirty) BASE FOG from heck! So I tried some in D-76 & Rodinal 1:25.

My question is... Which developer is most UN-likely to develop the fog that's already in the film?

There's not much, but Diafine really brought it out. The others not so much.

A camera store guy sold me some paper chemical he said would lessen the fog...

Any wisdom from the tank shakers out there?

Steve
__________________

What the heck is film and why does that man have an accordian with him?

http://www.SteveKarrShoots.com

http://www.SteveKarrAssists.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-09-2009   #2
Chriscrawfordphoto
Real Men Shoot Film.
 
Chriscrawfordphoto's Avatar
 
Chriscrawfordphoto is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Age: 37
Posts: 5,925
The chemical he sold you is probably Benzotriazole. Its an anti-fogging agent that is used in some obscure developer formulations from the past, but not so much anymore. It cuts your effective film speed. I wouldn't use it in a two bath developer like diafine, would try it as an additive to a standard developer like D76 and give a stop more exposure to begin with.
__________________
Christopher Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana

Back home again in Indiana

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com

My Technical Info pages: Film Developing times, scanning, printing, editing.

Like My Work on Facebook
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-09-2009   #3
Freakscene
I've chosen darkness
 
Freakscene's Avatar
 
Freakscene is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Zone I
Posts: 1,104
The solution you've been sold is probably benzotriazole, a restrainer. In normal developer it works to lower fog but you need to increase your development times.

Of the commercially available developers, HC110 is probably best for your purposes, but if the film is fogged due to age and poor storage, base fog will still be high. If you can manage it to a point where you can scan or print through the fog, it won't matter anymore.

Marty
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-09-2009   #4
Jaans
Registered User
 
Jaans is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 335
Second Freakscene's suggestion with HC110. I have found and read that it greatly reduces fog and apparently there is some guy over there on photo.net who helps people develop found film from 30 or more years ago and he always recommends HC110 to do that. I wouldn't use Rodinal as it would not help with that fog.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 20:29.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.