Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Cosina Voigtlander Bessa

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

CV single coating lens - filter?
Old 09-28-2010   #1
kshapero
Trigger finger
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,074
CV single coating lens - filter?

I usually use a B&W UV MRC filter on my lenses, but it occurred to me that on a single coated lens that might not be the best solution. Any ideas?
__________________
Akiva S.

bodies and glass

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero/

  Reply With Quote

Old 09-28-2010   #2
Robert Lai
Registered User
 
Robert Lai is online now
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 419
Why not? I just want the UV filter there for protection. I don't need it to add its own reflections into the image, especially with single-coated or uncoated lenses. Multicoating "minimizes the damage" of putting another two glass-air interface surfaces in the optical path. I use the B&W UV MRC even on my uncoated 9cm f/4 Elmar from the 1930s (34mm filter size).
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-28-2010   #3
P. Lynn Miller
Registered User
 
P. Lynn Miller's Avatar
 
P. Lynn Miller is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 817
The only filter I normally use on any of my lenses are color filters for B&W film. But when I bought my Color-Skopar 28/3.5 it came with a B+W UV MRC filter which I decided to let on the lens for good measure. I kept having trouble with flare and coma when shooting into strong light which became my main gripe against the lens. Recently I decided to give the 28/3.5 another chance, this time removing the filter and the issue with flare is gone.

I have never used a filter as a protection measure for the front element on any of my lenses and have never had a front element damaged. A good lens hood is a much better form of protection and increases flare resistance as well.
__________________

P. Lynn Miller
Sydney, Australia

I have one of those Flickr thingy's...
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-05-2010   #4
kshapero
Trigger finger
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,074
UV Filter or no filter?
__________________
Akiva S.

bodies and glass

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero/

  Reply With Quote

Old 10-05-2010   #5
Bruin
Noktonian
 
Bruin is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 329
The ideal UV filter will have absolutely no effect on your pictures. It would be the same as no filter at all.

Anything less than ideal (real world) may degrade sharpness, introduce a tint, or add flare to your shots. Aside from the first two, my guess is that if you're shooting under conditions where the filter is gonna flare, your single-coated lens is already gonna flare quite a bit anyways.

So you're adding the potential for more flare (assuming no sharpness or tint effects). Is that what you want? If you want even more flare, use an uncoated filter.... heck, stack 'em and see what happens!
__________________
~Kevin

Zeiss Ikon, Nokton 35/1.2 v1, Nokton 50/1.5
Neopan 400, Acros 100, 160S

  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 14:47.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.