Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Film vs Digital

Film vs Digital Discussions about the relative advantages and disadvantages of Film vs Digital are important as they can help us understand our choices as photographers. Each medium has strengths and weaknesses which can best be used in a given circumstance. While this makes for an interesting and useful discussion, DO NOT attack others who disagree with you. Forum rules are explained in the RFF FAQ linked at the top of each page.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Film is Dead!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?
Old 06-02-2010   #1
selma-1
Registered User
 
selma-1's Avatar
 
selma-1 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: LYNNWOOD WASHINGTON STATE U.S.A.
Age: 65
Posts: 72
Smile Film is Dead!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?

I hope this is the correct forum, if not the head bartender will move it. I like many of you out there use digital and film cameras. I currently own 2 digital cameras and 14 film cameras and a ton of lenses, Nikon, Contax, Voigtlander, and Rollei. All I here any more is how film is dead and everyone is going to digital and film will disapear. The photography magazines don't even test film any more. We need to write these magazines and tell them that they need to continue film tests, articles on film usage, and that Voigtlander is one company still making film cameras! It is still easy to get negative film processed and printed. Film is still readly available. Let's be heard and let all know that FILM is far from dead!
__________________
Nikon F, Two Nikon F3THP Champagne, F100, F90X, Nikon 16mm 2.8 ,18mm F2.8, 20-35mm F2.8 , 24-85mm F2.8-4, 50mm F1.4, 35-70 F3.5, 180 F2.8, 80-200 F2.8, 105 f2.8 Micro , 200 F4 Micro, 300 F4, Nikon D200, Nikon 12-24 F4, 16-85 F3.5-5.6 VR. Contax G-1, G-2, 21-28-35-45-90 Lenses Two Voigtlander R2s,15 F4.5 SL,21 F4, 25 F4, 28 F3.5, 35 F2.5, 50 F3.5, 50 F2.5, 50 F1.5, 85 F3.5 and Nikon 105 F2.5, 135 F3.5 Lenses. Rollei 35S Siilver and Rollei 35S Black, Contax T2

Last edited by selma-1 : 06-02-2010 at 20:04. Reason: To long
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-02-2010   #2
kshapero
User
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,058
Sounds like it's time for little hard liqueur.
__________________
Akiva S.

bodies and glass

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero/

  Reply With Quote

Old 06-02-2010   #3
MCTuomey
Registered User
 
MCTuomey's Avatar
 
MCTuomey is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: U.S.
Age: 59
Posts: 2,767
yes, grain alcohol ...
__________________
Mike

Bill Pierce's "photographer's proposition": I saw something wonderful, let me show it to you.

Leica and Zeiss M
Minolta Autocord
Fuji GX680 (in process)


My Smugmug Website
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-02-2010   #4
Chris101
I'm seeing double!
 
Chris101's Avatar
 
Chris101 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,623
How come this never comes up?
__________________
101-365
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-02-2010   #5
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,438
Spoken like a true American ... here in Oz it's not so rosey and possibly similarly struggling in other parts of the globe!

Decent black and white film where I live is nine dollars a roll and between ten and fifteen dollars per roll just to get the negatives processed, no scanning ... the last roll of E-6 I had done cost me twenty dollars for processing and they didn't even have to cut the negatives into strips!

Your soap box has termites!
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
  Reply With Quote

Film is Dead?
Old 06-02-2010   #6
selma-1
Registered User
 
selma-1's Avatar
 
selma-1 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: LYNNWOOD WASHINGTON STATE U.S.A.
Age: 65
Posts: 72
Film is Dead?

Keith that sucks, I like my digital Nikon but I still like to shoot film. I Started collecting film cameras in 1964 and think that to many people tried to kill film and promote Digital in it place, There is room for both in this world, and film doesn't have to be priced out of reach!
__________________
Nikon F, Two Nikon F3THP Champagne, F100, F90X, Nikon 16mm 2.8 ,18mm F2.8, 20-35mm F2.8 , 24-85mm F2.8-4, 50mm F1.4, 35-70 F3.5, 180 F2.8, 80-200 F2.8, 105 f2.8 Micro , 200 F4 Micro, 300 F4, Nikon D200, Nikon 12-24 F4, 16-85 F3.5-5.6 VR. Contax G-1, G-2, 21-28-35-45-90 Lenses Two Voigtlander R2s,15 F4.5 SL,21 F4, 25 F4, 28 F3.5, 35 F2.5, 50 F3.5, 50 F2.5, 50 F1.5, 85 F3.5 and Nikon 105 F2.5, 135 F3.5 Lenses. Rollei 35S Siilver and Rollei 35S Black, Contax T2
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-03-2010   #7
wgerrard
Registered User
 
wgerrard's Avatar
 
wgerrard is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Decent black and white film where I live is nine dollars a roll and between ten and fifteen dollars per roll just to get the negatives processed, no scanning ... the last roll of E-6 I had done cost me twenty dollars for processing and they didn't even have to cut the negatives into strips!
Keith, is it safe to assume that all film available in Australia is imported? How does the markup on imported film compare with the markup on other imported items? Are there competing importers and distributors, or does one outfit have a monopoly?

The USD is selling for about 1.20 AUD, so there's more going on that just the currency conversion. I've noticed that American products in Britain often seem to be priced thusly: First, convert price directly to pounds. I.e., if it sells for $100 in the U.S., mark it at Ł100. Then add on whatever mythical markup you think you can get away with.
__________________
Bill
-------------------------------------
This is my only legible signature.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-03-2010   #8
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by wgerrard View Post
Keith, is it safe to assume that all film available in Australia is imported? How does the markup on imported film compare with the markup on other imported items? Are there competing importers and distributors, or does one outfit have a monopoly?

The USD is selling for about 1.20 AUD, so there's more going on that just the currency conversion. I've noticed that American products in Britain often seem to be priced thusly: First, convert price directly to pounds. I.e., if it sells for $100 in the U.S., mark it at Ł100. Then add on whatever mythical markup you think you can get away with.
Dear Bill,

Given the number of film coating lines in Australia....

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-03-2010   #9
wotalegend
Registered User
 
wotalegend's Avatar
 
wotalegend is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 66
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Hicks View Post
Dear Bill,

Given the number of film coating lines in Australia....

Cheers,

R.
Well, there used to be. Kodak had quite a large plant here in Melbourne which made film, cameras, and even had a Kodachrome processing lab. But sadly it closed about ten years ago and the site is now converted to housing. Kodak, Fuji, and Ilford all have active offices here but all their product is imported (and the latter two import all their product to the US also). I think the problem with pricing by the time the product reaches retail level is more to do with the multi-level distribution chain and every level taking a profit than it is do do with a deliberate attempt to rip us off. Personally, I bypass that supply chain by buying from Freestyle about three times a year to minimise shipping costs, but it still ends up a lot less than local prices. As far as processing is concerned, I do my own conventional B&W, I can get C41 for AUD6.00 about fifteen minutes from home, and on the rare occasion I use E6 I can get that processed for AUD10.00 about 45 minutes from home. So I have nothing to complain about.

BTW, some years ago, before I was doing my own B&W, I asked the local lab what they would charge for conventional B&W. "Oh, about $40" was the reply.
__________________
Confirmed case of chronic GAS......possibly terminal
Leica M3, Bessa-R3A, Bessa-R, Bessa-L, Bessa-T, FEDs 1, 2, 3, & 5, Kievs 2A, 4 & 4A, Zorkis 1, 2S, 4K, 5, & 6, Moskva 5, Horizon S3, Yashica Minister-II, Minolta Hi-matic F, not counting digicams, DSLRs, SLRs, TLRs, etc.

Last edited by wotalegend : 06-03-2010 at 16:22.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-04-2010   #10
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by wotalegend View Post
Well, there used to be. Kodak had quite a large plant here in Melbourne which made film, cameras, and even had a Kodachrome processing lab. But sadly it closed about ten years ago and the site is now converted to housing. Kodak, Fuji, and Ilford all have active offices here but all their product is imported (and the latter two import all their product to the US also). I think the problem with pricing by the time the product reaches retail level is more to do with the multi-level distribution chain and every level taking a profit than it is do do with a deliberate attempt to rip us off. Personally, I bypass that supply chain by buying from Freestyle about three times a year to minimise shipping costs, but it still ends up a lot less than local prices. As far as processing is concerned, I do my own conventional B&W, I can get C41 for AUD6.00 about fifteen minutes from home, and on the rare occasion I use E6 I can get that processed for AUD10.00 about 45 minutes from home. So I have nothing to complain about.

BTW, some years ago, before I was doing my own B&W, I asked the local lab what they would charge for conventional B&W. "Oh, about $40" was the reply.
That, and of course shipping.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-03-2010   #11
KarlG
Registered User
 
KarlG is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Decent black and white film where I live is nine dollars a roll and between ten and fifteen dollars per roll just to get the negatives processed, no scanning ... the last roll of E-6 I had done cost me twenty dollars for processing and they didn't even have to cut the negatives into strips!
$20? That's ridiculous - would be enough to make me want to learn to do my own E6 if I had to pay that..

Keith, where are you located? I use a good pro lab in Sydney for my slide and pay $8.50 AU per roll.. Might almost be worth mailing it to somewhere like that, rather than paying $20!
__________________
Leica M8 - Leica M4-P
CV 15mm/4.5 - Biogon 25/2.8 - Summicron 50/2 - Nokton 50/1.1 - Jupiter-3 50/1.5 - Elmar-C 90/4
Flickr: http://flic.kr/ps/V1Ggw
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-03-2010   #12
acheyj
Registered User
 
acheyj is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Australia
Posts: 227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Spoken like a true American ... here in Oz it's not so rosey and possibly similarly struggling in other parts of the globe!

Decent black and white film where I live is nine dollars a roll and between ten and fifteen dollars per roll just to get the negatives processed, no scanning ... the last roll of E-6 I had done cost me twenty dollars for processing and they didn't even have to cut the negatives into strips!

Your soap box has termites!
Hi Keith, thort we wuz in a backward City in a Backward state in SA, local camera house $10 processed and scanned to a CD in 30min to 1 hour for colour neg 24exp. So maybe wont emigrate to Queensland after all ! so I can keep my stable of OM's going. MF is another story all together.

BTW we dont use soap in SA, too cold to wash.

ron
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-29-2010   #13
GoodOldNorm
Registered User
 
GoodOldNorm's Avatar
 
GoodOldNorm is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Spoken like a true American ... here in Oz it's not so rosey and possibly similarly struggling in other parts of the globe!

Decent black and white film where I live is nine dollars a roll and between ten and fifteen dollars per roll just to get the negatives processed, no scanning ... the last roll of E-6 I had done cost me twenty dollars for processing and they didn't even have to cut the negatives into strips!

Your soap box has termites!
Kieth for film www.7dayshop.com tetenal e6 chemicles on ebay uk postage may be the killer but may work out cheaper in bulk. regards Norm
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-03-2010   #14
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by chippy View Post
$2-$2.50 a roll for C41 ,no scanning here in Adelaide. E6 processing is about $10-$12 a roll, has been for years, 35mm or 120..i dont know anybody that gets or even contemplates getting a lab to process standard B&W film and considering it pretty much has to be hand done i would expect it not to be too cheap.

personally i never touch the C41 B&W, I always consider that stuff only for people that cant or wont use standard B&W film or in an emergency (perhaps away on holidays or something and without decent alternatives perhaps) i much prefer proper B&W film but if you do use C41 B&W then it costs around $2 to process here
What's your specific objection? Grain? Sharpness? Tonality?

Cheers.

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-02-2010   #15
Krzys
Registered User
 
Krzys is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Christchurch, NZ
Posts: 381
Slide film is something I'll never touch in Australia due to the insane cost.
__________________

  Reply With Quote

Old 06-02-2010   #16
benno
Hack.
 
benno is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krzys View Post
Slide film is something I'll never touch in Australia due to the insane cost.
mmm I bought a bunch of Velvia 50 on ebay (120 format) for less than $10 a roll and it's $12 a roll to get processed at Photo Continental.
__________________
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-03-2010   #17
35mmdelux
Registered User
 
35mmdelux's Avatar
 
35mmdelux is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,210
I'm down to 10 rolls of Kodachrome 25 and 4 rolls of K200. Giving up Kodachrome after December.
__________________
Canon 5d MKII : 35mm f.1.4L

M7 : 35 Summilux : 50 Summilux
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-04-2010   #18
Haigh
Gary Haigh
 
Haigh is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 971
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krzys View Post
Slide film is something I'll never touch in Australia due to the insane cost.
The photographer Harvey Bengebuys Fuji Provia 100F transparency film from Adorama in NYC and he says that even with freight to New Zealand it is cheaper than where he lives in Auckland. You might wish to check out their film prices.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-04-2010   #19
Ronald_H
Don't call me Ron
 
Ronald_H's Avatar
 
Ronald_H is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Helmond, The Netherlands
Age: 41
Posts: 1,582
In the Netherlands it is still fairly easy to get film in the shops. If I jump on my bike I'll have film in my hands in about 10 minutes. Even easier is to buy on-line from the Netherlands itself, the UK or Germany. Overnight shipping, low prices, all the flavours you can think off.

B/W processing I can do myself, C41 processing I can choose between 2 working days or one hour processing. Both good and not very expensive. Again, 10min by bike.

Currently my freezer is full with nearly free expired film and also some fresh stuff. The last few years I spend a neat sum on CLA-ing old analogue favourites and I actually got three people to start using film again.

It just can't last...
__________________
"The only substitute for Tri-X is more Tri-X"

My Flickr

My regular website: www.lookupinwonder.nl
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-04-2010   #20
kossi008
Photon Counter
 
kossi008's Avatar
 
kossi008 is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dresden, Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 621
I seem to have it even better, I can *walk* to my photo store in 10 minutes, and they develop in 24 hours, which is good enough for me. I only take my C-41 and E-6 there, B/W I develop myself.

I would be lying, however, if I said I wasn't taking advantage of the low internet prices for film... and the broader range available there. So if my local store closes down one day, it will be partly my fault...
__________________
Photon Counter
Zeiss Ikon, Bessa R4A, Sony Nex-5N; CV 15/4.5, ZM 25/2.8, ZM 35/2, ZM 50/2, CV 75/2.5
My flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/25547701@N08/
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-05-2010   #21
Nikkor AIS
Nikkor AIS
 
Nikkor AIS's Avatar
 
Nikkor AIS is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 804
When I hear the "film is dead" mantra, I always smile. After more than 25 years of shooting and a plethora of digital cameras (Nikon D3's, D2H ...OO) at my disposal, I'm more "into" shooting film than ever. The deal with the quitters is they want to feel better for throwing their film cameras under the bus. And then there are those who've never shot a roll of film, and wouldn't know how to load a film camera if they had to. If people either quit, or just don't know, then it's easier to swallow if everyone else follows along. As far as weddings go, I just booked two partly because of work with film.

As for me, I have my heart set on a minty black Leica MP to go along with my M6/M7. I can't believe the price that this camera is going for. It's sweet. Using these M cameras has inspired me to really get out there and shoot twice as much as I did just using my Nikon D3 and F3T for that matter.

The good thing in having so many cry the sky is falling is that there are deals to be had. I bought two boxes of Ektapress 100/160 ASA, 50 rolls for $2 a roll. They've been in the fridge for 10 years and the film is fine. I know the store has three more cases of film I'll be going back for.

A few sample of recent work with film.













All taken with Leica M6/M7 and 50 1.0 Noctilux/Summilux 35 1.4/Voigtlander 28 1.9 ASPH glass, with Ektar 100 and 400 Superstore film.

Gregory

Last edited by Nikkor AIS : 06-06-2010 at 04:49.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-02-2010   #22
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,656
counting the posts...
__________________
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100


"learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist"
pablo picasso

...it is very simple to be happy, but it is very difficult to be simple...
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-02-2010   #23
naruto
GASitis.. finally cured?
 
naruto's Avatar
 
naruto is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 628
I think it's pretty cool that there are exactly 42 '!' in the thread subject.
__________________
~ash
-------

me @ Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-05-2010   #24
Time Freeze
Registered User
 
Time Freeze is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by naruto View Post
I think it's pretty cool that there are exactly 42 '!' in the thread subject.
I think its cool that you counted them .
__________________
Flickr Gallery
www.flickr.com/photos/timefreeze

TimeFreezePhotos.com

Accept the fact that some days you are the pigeon and some days you are the statue.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-02-2010   #25
koniczech
Registered User
 
koniczech's Avatar
 
koniczech is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Behind my GSN
Posts: 94
I assume it's safe to say that as long as CVS sells disposable cameras, they will do C41. It's just too bad that there aren't more B&W C41 films out there. Last time I went to the Hunts Photo down the street, they only had one B&W C41, Ilford XP2 400. I used to use Walmart BW400CN (wicked cheap there, too) but they stopped stocking and I actually got the last box at the store. Now it's unreasonable expensive to buy it from amazon and pay for shipping. Since it costs 3x more and takes 48x longer to develop any film at Hunt's I'm (in a practical sense) stuck with CVS.

Despite my dislike for them, I'm rooting for the survival of the disposable camera!

koniczech
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:50.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.