Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Digital Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M"

Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" Discussions about the Leica M8 /M 8.2 / M9 / M9-P/ M-E / M Monochrom / M10 aka "M": Leica digital M mount rangefinder cameras. Naming the new digital M the "Leica M" is VERY unfortunate as it will only confuse newbies with other Leica M cameras of the the past. Happily there is room for confusion with only the past 59 years of Leica M production ... since Leica introduced the Leica M system in 1953. All Hail for the Leica Marketing Department learning Leica M history!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

M8 with a 135 lens...
Old 12-14-2009   #1
ajpat
ajpat
 
ajpat is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: India-Bombay
Posts: 25
M8 with a 135 lens...

Hi,

Anyone using the 135mm f3.4 or f4.0 lens with an M8/9? Would like to know the quality of the images.

Thanks--ajpat
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-15-2009   #2
ramosa
Registered User
 
ramosa is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 913
glad to follow this stream. the one lens i am pondering for the future is the 135mm.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-15-2009   #3
jl-lb.ms
Registered User
 
jl-lb.ms's Avatar
 
jl-lb.ms is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach, MS
Posts: 227
Here's one with the 135. I just use the focus patch on whatever is of interest. Not exact, but workable.

  Reply With Quote

Old 12-16-2009   #4
paulhart
Registered User
 
paulhart is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 71
The antepenultimate (pardon me) version of the 135/4 Tele-Elmar must be just about the best value there is at the moment. I have recently moved back into Leica after wandering in dSLR territory for a while, and picked up a nearly mint version for £169. I can see no real difference to the results I got on a 3.4 APO I used to have. I'm using it on an 8.2 and it's fine.

As a previous poster said, put what's interesting right in the middle and if it's not too big, all should be well.
__________________
Paul Hart

Voigtlander Bessa III 667 W
Leica III Black & Nickel
Leica IIIg
Leica X2
Fuji X-E1
Rolleiflex 2.8F
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-17-2009   #5
Austerby
Registered User
 
Austerby's Avatar
 
Austerby is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fircombe
Posts: 910
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulhart View Post
The antepenultimate (pardon me) version of the 135/4 Tele-Elmar must be just about the best value there is at the moment. I have recently moved back into Leica after wandering in dSLR territory for a while, and picked up a nearly mint version for £169.
It certainly is - that was a great price but they can be found for even less: I picked up an excellent example for £77 earlier this year and have used it more than I expected to. £ per picture it's definitely my most cost efficient lens and a great performer - though mine is on an M3 as I don't have a dM.
__________________
Austerby
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-16-2009   #6
ajpat
ajpat
 
ajpat is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: India-Bombay
Posts: 25
Is there a difference ( image quality wise) between the older designed and the new design of the Tele Elmar lens?
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-17-2009   #7
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 7,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajpat View Post
Is there a difference ( image quality wise) between the older designed and the new design of the Tele Elmar lens?
No - the optical part is the same, it was purely a cosmetic change to the barrel to bring it in line with the rest of the lenses.
__________________
Jaap








jaapvphotography
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-01-2010   #8
Hacker
黑客
 
Hacker's Avatar
 
Hacker is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 984
I has almost no keepers using the 135mm APO with the M8/M8.2 cameras. Almost sold the 135mm until I got the M9. Works like a charm and is indeed an exceptional lens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-16-2009   #9
RichC
Registered User
 
RichC is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 667
Taken with an old Canon 135mm rangefinder lens on my M8.

Clicking on the thumbnail below, then on the "Full Size" link (or the image itself) on the ImageShack page will take you to a full size version (approx. 2500 x 3700 pixels) of this photo so you see the quality (sorry about the squares and lines - my agency would be unhappy if I released pristine images into the wild!).

I say full size - I have cropped it a little, but haven't reduced the size.

As an aside, you may be interested in why I use this Canon lens and not a more modern Leica one. The reason is that the latter will give a higher contrast image but not one appreciably sharper. But I prefer lenses from the 60s-80s with digital, as I feel that the modern taste for high contrast does not suit digital, leading to loss of detail in shadows and highlights (the situation is much improved with modern cameras, but it's still there). With an older lens, I can always create a more contrasty look if I prefer, but it's harder to reduce contrast as information required for better tonality may be missing in light and dark areas in photos taken with a modern high-contrast lens.

PS: I place imaginary framelines between the 90mm lines and the focusing patch. Oner of those cheap-ish eBay viewfinder magnifiers helps, as does chimping. Despite the long focal length, focusing seems to be as accurate as with a 90mm lens (i.e. not problematic, though care is needed).

__________________

-=Rich=-


Portfolio: www.richcutler.co.uk

Last edited by RichC : 12-16-2009 at 00:50.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-16-2009   #10
Ben Z
Registered User
 
Ben Z is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,375
The 135 Tele Elmar is one of my favorite lenses. I use just the lens head on my Canon digitals with a short focus mount, on an M/Viso-to-R adaptor, plus an R-to-EOS adaptor. At first used it on the M8 that way on a visoflex, but then started using it on its regular long mount. I found an old Canon rangefinder 135mm accessory finder that because of my glasses I can only see a cropped area, which just by luck turns out to be just right for the M8.
__________________
MY GALLERY
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-17-2009   #11
ramosa
Registered User
 
ramosa is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 913
does this mean that coding is unnecessary/optional? that's one thing i have pondered--whether coding is necessary and, if so, how much it costs. (i use an M8.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSU View Post
I use the 135/4 Tele-Elmar on my M8.2. When mounting I depress the lens lock button and overturn the lens beyond it's intended stop. This causes no harm and brings-up the 90mm frames instead of the 35mm marks. I imagine a rectangle halfway between the 90mm lines and the rangefinder frame. Image review helps but with only a little practice I do fairly well with this method.

The images look nice, it is somewhat of a foreign experience to be shooting a 180mm field of view with a Leica M.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-31-2009   #12
dotur
od karnevala
 
dotur's Avatar
 
dotur is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 1,374
M8, Tele-Elmar 135/4, no filter, no coding.

http://www.ivanlozica.com/yahoo_site...7.36432033.jpg

http://www.ivanlozica.com/yahoo_site...8.36432114.jpg


www.ivanlozica.com
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:15.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.