Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > TLR Forum - Twin Lens Reflex

TLR Forum - Twin Lens Reflex another alternative to the dreaded SLR way of seeing, this forum for all format TLR cameras

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Whats the difference between a Ricohflex TLR,and aRicoh Diacord,
Old 08-22-2006   #1
SCOTFORTHLAD
Slow learner,but keen!
 
SCOTFORTHLAD's Avatar
 
SCOTFORTHLAD is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK.
Age: 68
Posts: 714
Whats the difference between a Ricohflex TLR,and aRicoh Diacord,

How can you tell them apart?I've seen a few Ricohflexes on Ebay,but not specifically a Diacord.Is the latter clearly different?

Brian
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-22-2006   #2
Todd.Hanz
Registered User
 
Todd.Hanz's Avatar
 
Todd.Hanz is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Texas
Age: 48
Posts: 4,966
Not sure about the differences but, I have a Ricohflex Dia L, it has the lever focus vs. the knob focus that alot of TLR's have. The lens is "wicked" good, the body is heavy and well built, you won't go wrong with one of these, it's a sleeper when it comes to TLR's so you can usually get one at a decent price.

a few samples at my blog:

http://apeture.my-expressions.com/ar...9239132/155939

http://apeture.my-expressions.com/ar...9239132/157092

http://apeture.my-expressions.com/ar...9239132/156267

http://apeture.my-expressions.com/ar...9239132/156665

Todd
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-22-2006   #3
SCOTFORTHLAD
Slow learner,but keen!
 
SCOTFORTHLAD's Avatar
 
SCOTFORTHLAD is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK.
Age: 68
Posts: 714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd.Hanz
Not sure about the differences but, I have a Ricohflex Dia L, it has the lever focus vs. the knob focus that alot of TLR's have. The lens is "wicked" good, the body is heavy and well built, you won't go wrong with one of these, it's a sleeper when it comes to TLR's so you can usually get one at a decent price.

a few samples at my blog:

http://apeture.my-expressions.com/ar...9239132/155939

http://apeture.my-expressions.com/ar...9239132/157092

http://apeture.my-expressions.com/ar...9239132/156267

http://apeture.my-expressions.com/ar...9239132/156665

Todd
Todd,
Thanks for the advice and comments.
Those are tremendous photos,a great advert for the camera,not to mention the taker!
Brian.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-22-2006   #4
SCOTFORTHLAD
Slow learner,but keen!
 
SCOTFORTHLAD's Avatar
 
SCOTFORTHLAD is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK.
Age: 68
Posts: 714
Quote:
Originally Posted by greyhoundman
Here is a site with a little info.

http://members.aol.com/dcolucci/ricoh.htm
Dave,
Thanks for the link,it helps a lot.
Cheers,
Brian.
PS.Got the first roll from the R/Cord back today.Twelve prints out of twelve,which is ok.for me first time out.Some lovely pics,with just a couple a little out of focus.Thanks again for a great little camera!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-22-2006   #5
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
 
KoNickon is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hartford, CT USA
Age: 54
Posts: 2,147
What I call the "true" Ricohflex had lenses that focused together by means of meshed gearing, which was visible at the base of the lenses. The lenses on these were three element, I think, and the camera was not of as good quality as the Diacord.

Now, I happen to have a camera that says "Ricohflex" but it's otherwise identical to a Diacord G (the unmetered version), with the Tessar design Rikenon lens and the very handy focusing levers. So you might well find one of those; that sounds like what Todd.Hanz has also (though his has a meter). I guess Ricoh started calling them Diacords only later, so Ricohflex was at one time the name they gave all their TLRs.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-22-2006   #6
Ash
Selflessly Self-involved
 
Ash is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,222
Already moving onto Ricoh, and so soon after the Rollei??
__________________
www.nps160.co.uk
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-22-2006   #7
SCOTFORTHLAD
Slow learner,but keen!
 
SCOTFORTHLAD's Avatar
 
SCOTFORTHLAD is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK.
Age: 68
Posts: 714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
Already moving onto Ricoh, and so soon after the Rollei??
Hi Ash---- 61 is a dangerous age !!!!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-23-2006   #8
SCOTFORTHLAD
Slow learner,but keen!
 
SCOTFORTHLAD's Avatar
 
SCOTFORTHLAD is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK.
Age: 68
Posts: 714
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTFORTHLAD
Hi Ash---- 61 is a dangerous age !!!!
Thanks everyone for all the comments.

However with UK prices for medium format processing(around 10.00pounds for 12 prints at 5x5,and 15.00 for scanning to a CD),I must be nuts for even contemplating buying and using aTLR,or any other medium format camera!

Cheers,
Brian.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-22-2006   #9
Stephanie Brim
Mental Experimental.
 
Stephanie Brim's Avatar
 
Stephanie Brim is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Iowa
Age: 30
Posts: 2,881
Now Todd can make me want things just as much as Brian did.

Well...anyone want a broken Meopta so that I can pick up one of these things?
__________________

I had a baby girl on December 6, 2007. Yay motherhood!


One camera. Two lenses. Three shots per week.

2008 Street Photography Project
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-22-2006   #10
Stephanie Brim
Mental Experimental.
 
Stephanie Brim's Avatar
 
Stephanie Brim is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Iowa
Age: 30
Posts: 2,881
Yeah, BTW: Rollei TLRs, especially the Rolleicords, are nice cameras. They can be had for relatively low prices now if you look at the right times. If you're looking for a Vb, though, like I am, it seems they all sell for about $400.
__________________

I had a baby girl on December 6, 2007. Yay motherhood!


One camera. Two lenses. Three shots per week.

2008 Street Photography Project
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-22-2006   #11
Flyfisher Tom
Registered User
 
Flyfisher Tom's Avatar
 
Flyfisher Tom is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: on the river ...
Posts: 1,989
The Diacord is essentially the equivalent quality of a Rolleicord and Autocord, for at least 1/2 to a 1/3 of the price. The lens on this camera, as Todd has noted, is exceptional and the equal of the Xenar.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-23-2006   #12
Ash
Selflessly Self-involved
 
Ash is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,222
Just develop your own, it'll work out much cheaper.

My b&w costs me pennies


I'll be buying a C-41 kit when I can afford it, then that means low cost colour as well...


You know you want to!



I got sick of sending away for processing after ONE film. Jessops "yea yea 10 days" more like 2 weeks or so, and a set of tiny little prints not even worth the paper they were printed on. They even stuck stickers like "warning double exposure" all over it when the effects were clearly deliberate.

Never again have they got money off me!
__________________
www.nps160.co.uk
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-23-2006   #13
SCOTFORTHLAD
Slow learner,but keen!
 
SCOTFORTHLAD's Avatar
 
SCOTFORTHLAD is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK.
Age: 68
Posts: 714
That would certainly be the answer,but I would need a scanner capable of handling the film,and having read the various threads detailing file sizes,compressing files,dpi, etc.etc.it all seems a bit technical.I can manage scanning prints on my basic scanner,but not so sure about doing film
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's the difference here? DHu Leica M Film Cameras 3 02-18-2005 04:23



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.