| TLR Forum - Twin Lens Reflex another alternative to the dreaded SLR way of seeing, this forum for all format TLR cameras |
 |
Whats the difference between a Ricohflex TLR,and aRicoh Diacord, |
 |
08-22-2006
|
#1
|
|
Slow learner,but keen!
SCOTFORTHLAD is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK.
Age: 68
Posts: 714
|
Whats the difference between a Ricohflex TLR,and aRicoh Diacord,
How can you tell them apart?I've seen a few Ricohflexes on Ebay,but not specifically a Diacord.Is the latter clearly different?
Brian
|
|
|
|
08-22-2006
|
#3
|
|
Slow learner,but keen!
SCOTFORTHLAD is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK.
Age: 68
Posts: 714
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Todd.Hanz
|
Todd,
Thanks for the advice and comments.
Those are tremendous photos,a great advert for the camera,not to mention the taker!
Brian.
|
|
|
|
08-22-2006
|
#4
|
|
Slow learner,but keen!
SCOTFORTHLAD is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK.
Age: 68
Posts: 714
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by greyhoundman
|
Dave,
Thanks for the link,it helps a lot.
Cheers,
Brian.
PS.Got the first roll from the R/Cord back today.Twelve prints out of twelve,which is ok.for me first time out.Some lovely pics,with just a couple a little out of focus.Thanks again for a great little camera! 
|
|
|
|
08-22-2006
|
#5
|
|
Nick Merritt
KoNickon is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hartford, CT USA
Age: 54
Posts: 2,147
|
What I call the "true" Ricohflex had lenses that focused together by means of meshed gearing, which was visible at the base of the lenses. The lenses on these were three element, I think, and the camera was not of as good quality as the Diacord.
Now, I happen to have a camera that says "Ricohflex" but it's otherwise identical to a Diacord G (the unmetered version), with the Tessar design Rikenon lens and the very handy focusing levers. So you might well find one of those; that sounds like what Todd.Hanz has also (though his has a meter). I guess Ricoh started calling them Diacords only later, so Ricohflex was at one time the name they gave all their TLRs.
|
|
|
|
08-22-2006
|
#6
|
|
Selflessly Self-involved
Ash is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,222
|
Already moving onto Ricoh, and so soon after the Rollei?? 
|
|
|
|
08-22-2006
|
#7
|
|
Slow learner,but keen!
SCOTFORTHLAD is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK.
Age: 68
Posts: 714
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ash
Already moving onto Ricoh, and so soon after the Rollei?? 
|
Hi Ash---- 61 is a dangerous age !!!!
|
|
|
|
08-23-2006
|
#8
|
|
Slow learner,but keen!
SCOTFORTHLAD is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK.
Age: 68
Posts: 714
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SCOTFORTHLAD
Hi Ash---- 61 is a dangerous age !!!!
|
Thanks everyone for all the comments.
However with UK prices for medium format processing(around 10.00pounds for 12 prints at 5x5,and 15.00 for scanning to a CD),I must be nuts for even contemplating buying and using aTLR,or any other medium format camera!
Cheers,
Brian.
|
|
|
|
08-22-2006
|
#9
|
|
Mental Experimental.
Stephanie Brim is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Iowa
Age: 30
Posts: 2,881
|
Now Todd can make me want things just as much as Brian did.
Well...anyone want a broken Meopta so that I can pick up one of these things?
|
|
|
|
08-22-2006
|
#10
|
|
Mental Experimental.
Stephanie Brim is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Iowa
Age: 30
Posts: 2,881
|
Yeah, BTW: Rollei TLRs, especially the Rolleicords, are nice cameras. They can be had for relatively low prices now if you look at the right times. If you're looking for a Vb, though, like I am, it seems they all sell for about $400. 
|
|
|
|
08-22-2006
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Flyfisher Tom is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: on the river ...
Posts: 1,989
|
The Diacord is essentially the equivalent quality of a Rolleicord and Autocord, for at least 1/2 to a 1/3 of the price. The lens on this camera, as Todd has noted, is exceptional and the equal of the Xenar.
|
|
|
|
08-23-2006
|
#12
|
|
Selflessly Self-involved
Ash is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,222
|
Just develop your own, it'll work out much cheaper.
My b&w costs me pennies
I'll be buying a C-41 kit when I can afford it, then that means low cost colour as well...
You know you want to!
I got sick of sending away for processing after ONE film. Jessops "yea yea 10 days" more like 2 weeks or so, and a set of tiny little prints not even worth the paper they were printed on. They even stuck stickers like "warning double exposure" all over it when the effects were clearly deliberate.
Never again have they got money off me!
|
|
|
|
08-23-2006
|
#13
|
|
Slow learner,but keen!
SCOTFORTHLAD is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK.
Age: 68
Posts: 714
|
That would certainly be the answer,but I would need a scanner capable of handling the film,and having read the various threads detailing file sizes,compressing files,dpi, etc.etc.it all seems a bit technical.I can manage scanning prints on my basic scanner,but not so sure about doing film 
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35. |
|
|