Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film > Photo Software

Photo Software Discussions of all the photo software - except scanning software which is in the forum with scanners.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Silver Efex Pro 2 questions
Old 07-01-2012   #1
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,679
Silver Efex Pro 2 questions

does it work with photoshop elements?
what do you like about it?
what don't you like about it?
did you try it and stop using it? why?

i'm wondering if i should go ahead and buy it, if it is worth it for my style of shooting/processing...i like that keep it simple approach...

i plan to download the 15 day trial offer soon.
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #2
LTN
Registered User
 
LTN is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 26
It's a great piece of software, but I had trouble getting it to work with Photoshop Elements so I now use Lightroom. And, to be honest, i normally process my B/W pictures in Lightroom and don't use the Silverefex plugin. It is useful for special applications. Bottom line is, it's probably worth the money in the long run... Good luck.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #3
astro8
Registered User
 
astro8's Avatar
 
astro8 is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 50
Posts: 801
does it work with photoshop elements?
Not quite sure, as I use CS4, but expect it does.

what do you like about it?
It's pretty intuitive with good control. Easy to perform 'what if's' and to get a good idea of where you might want to take your image processing wise. Cycling through the presets is fast, virtually no lag. I like the control points for dodging & burning etc...

what don't you like about it?
The canned film settings are a bit too contrasty for my taste. I usually start off with a 'neutral' setting and go from there.

did you try it and stop using it? why?
No...the more I use it, the more I use it.
__________________
-Greg

My RFF Gallery

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #4
Gerry M
Gerry
 
Gerry M's Avatar
 
Gerry M is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Medford, Oregon, U. S.
Posts: 486
Joe,
I use it with PS E9. Also used it with E7. I like it a lot. I shoot b&w film and digital for color. To my eyes, the digital color files, when processed with SFX2 are the equal to b&w film. If it wasn't for the fact that I enjoy using film bodies, I probably would switch to 100% digital.
I should have added that it works with CS2 as well.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #5
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,679
i have pse 8 and 9 installed...but i mostly use 8.
i understand the pull of film bodies....i prefer digital these days but still like the old bodies.
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #6
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,679
did you try it and stop using it? why?
No...the more I use it, the more I use it.

interesting...my fear of new software has led me to not buy lightroom after trying the trial period...
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #7
astro8
Registered User
 
astro8's Avatar
 
astro8 is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 50
Posts: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley View Post
did you try it and stop using it? why?
No...the more I use it, the more I use it.

interesting...my fear of new software has led me to not buy lightroom after trying the trial period...
I don't use lightroom either, don't like it.

I use photoshop, sometimes epson raw along with mediapro for file management.
__________________
-Greg

My RFF Gallery

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #8
Gerry M
Gerry
 
Gerry M's Avatar
 
Gerry M is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Medford, Oregon, U. S.
Posts: 486
The only reason I bought E9 was that E7 would not open RAW files from my G1. Otherwise, SFX2 worked fine with E7. As mentioned above, it is a very intuitive program. Easy to try various approaches to get the effect you are after.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #9
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerry M View Post
The only reason I bought E9 was that E7 would not open RAW files from my G1. Otherwise, SFX2 worked fine with E7. As mentioned above, it is a very intuitive program. Easy to try various approaches to get the effect you are after.
i bought 8 for raw on the x100...and then traded the x100 away...
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #10
Gerry M
Gerry
 
Gerry M's Avatar
 
Gerry M is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Medford, Oregon, U. S.
Posts: 486
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley View Post
i bought 8 for raw on the x100...and then traded the x100 away...
It seems that you have settled back into your realm with the RD1 kits.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #11
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerry M View Post
It seems that you have settled back into your realm with the RD1 kits.
yes...peace at last.
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #12
ricnak
Registered User
 
ricnak is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane Australia
Age: 48
Posts: 936
I only have LR.

I like Silver Efex Pro it because it is simple. You can see the effects as you go.

The presets are a bit drastic for my taste. I like some of them, but don't feel quite right using them. I start with neutral and tend not to do much. I don't even look at film types.

I will keep using it because I like having a border.

I started with the trial version.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #13
ChrisN
Striving
 
ChrisN's Avatar
 
ChrisN is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 4,258
Joe - just for interest there is a workaround that lets you use SEP2 as a stand-alone program. (This is for Windows - don't know about Macs.) Install the Lightroom version of the program, which installs on your computer the SEP executable program. Locate the executable (Silver Efex Pro 2.exe) and create a desktop shortcut. Now open the folder with the image file that you want to edit, select the file, then drag-and-drop the file onto the SEP2 shortcut. The program should open with the file to be edited.

Remember that SEP2 makes permanent changes to your files, so always work on a copy, preferably a high-quality tiff format copy.
__________________
Chris


"The mission of photography is to explain man to man and each to himself. And that is the most complicated thing on earth."
Edward Steichen


I hardly know her

My Top 10
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #14
ReeRay
Registered User
 
ReeRay is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hua Hin Thailand
Age: 67
Posts: 272
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisN View Post
Joe - just for interest there is a workaround that lets you use SEP2 as a stand-alone program. (This is for Windows - don't know about Macs.) Install the Lightroom version of the program, which installs on your computer the SEP executable program. Locate the executable (Silver Efex Pro 2.exe) and create a desktop shortcut. Now open the folder with the image file that you want to edit, select the file, then drag-and-drop the file onto the SEP2 shortcut. The program should open with the file to be edited.

Remember that SEP2 makes permanent changes to your files, so always work on a copy, preferably a high-quality tiff format copy.
It does indeed work on Macs which is how I use it. Great software.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #15
mrtoml
Registered User
 
mrtoml's Avatar
 
mrtoml is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sheffield, UK
Age: 47
Posts: 640
I recently downloaded the trial of silver efex pro and the trial of alien skin exposure 4 to try side by side. I liked both, but they are quite different. There were elements of efex that I would have liked in exposure and vice versa. In the end I bought exposure. It might be worth trying exposure as well, but it is more expensive.
__________________
Cheers,
Mark

Bronica RF645+65/4. Bessa R2A. Leica M6. Nokton 50/1.5. Zeiss Biogon 35/2.8.
Ricoh GRD II. Fuji X-100. Sony Nex-7. Sony A900.
Lots of Nikon SLRs and manual lenses.

Lithprinting forum:
http://www.lithprinting.net/
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-02-2012   #16
greyelm
Malcolm Smith
 
greyelm's Avatar
 
greyelm is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,591
Have a look at Snapseed, also by Nik Software, includes a B&W module, works stand alone or as a plugin and best of all only costs $20
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-02-2012   #17
f16sunshine
Like boots in the dryer..
 
f16sunshine's Avatar
 
f16sunshine is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 3,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by greyelm View Post
Have a look at Snapseed, also by Nik Software, includes a B&W module, works stand alone or as a plugin and best of all only costs $20

I like snap seed as well. But only for iPhone or iPad.
The files coming out are quite compressed and not worthy of printing larger than 5x7.
For internet use it's great and a very cool easy to use app for iPhone camera companion.

Like SEP 2 very much. It works well as a Plug in for Aperture 3. Worth the $200 for someone like you Joe who shoots only digital.
The local control points are very useful and intuitive. It's like dodging/burning and using ing Contrast filters in the wet darkroom once you get the hang of it.
The film presets IMO are only starting points. I've never been satisfied with any of the presets used as they are. Always tweaking and usually that involves lowering contrast and adjusting "grain".
__________________
Andy
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-02-2012   #18
kuvvy
Registered User
 
kuvvy's Avatar
 
kuvvy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 56
Posts: 1,212
Joe, I just got SEP2 a few weeks ago and I like it although I don't use it on every shot. I use LR3 mostly though I do have PS as well. SEP2 is quite slow to open an image and some of the presets are quite harsh. Sometimes though if I can't get the result in LR3 then SEP2 can often show me an alternative way to achieve a decent image. The few shots I've posted so far on Flickr usually have the word 'edit' at the end if you wanna see my examples.

Paul
__________________
Fuji X-Pro 1, Fuji X100, Sony RX100, Ricoh GRD IV, Fuji F30, Oly Trip 35, Vivitar UWS.

Flickr gallery

Home Page http://www.wix.com/paulkowalczuk/paulfoto
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-02-2012   #19
sevres_babylone
Registered User
 
sevres_babylone is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,052
I like it very much. I use it with Photoshop.

I like what they call u-points (I think) for selective adjustments. I was never an expert at making masks for corrections in Photoshop, and find the selective adjustment facility in SEP very helpful.

I also like the fact that the pre-sets can be used just as a starting point, from which you can then adjust curves, colour filtration, etc.
__________________
Visit me at Pbase
and at Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-02-2012   #20
Jobin
Registered User
 
Jobin's Avatar
 
Jobin is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 212
Isn't it like an expensive instagram?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-02-2012   #21
f16sunshine
Like boots in the dryer..
 
f16sunshine's Avatar
 
f16sunshine is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 3,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jobin View Post
Isn't it like an expensive instagram?
No, it's a real editing program. Not just preset filters. There are presets as well but much more thoughtfully designed and completely adjustable.
__________________
Andy
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-02-2012   #22
greyelm
Malcolm Smith
 
greyelm's Avatar
 
greyelm is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,591
The desktop version of Snapseed (Mac & Windows) doesn't appear to compress files excessively. A 20mb raw file when saved from Snapseed as a tif file becomes 18mb. This was after a B&W conversion.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-02-2012   #23
Murchu
Registered User
 
Murchu is offline
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ireland
Age: 34
Posts: 600
Nice piece of software, and have to say always happy with the results I get. Don't use it with Elements, as I prefer to use it from within Lightroom, so can't help you there. I don't like the way it creates an extra Tiff file when roundtripping it from Lightroom though, and to be honest have gotten used to non-destructive editing, and find it hard to have a file where I cannot see what steps I took to get there, as well as having the flexibility to tweak it later. In any case, my preference for a uniform black and white look, and my stubbornness to be able to get good black and white results on my own, have meant I have not used Silver Efex in a good while.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-02-2012   #24
CK Dexter Haven
Registered User
 
CK Dexter Haven is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 993
re: Silver Efex "I will keep using it because I like having a border."

Silver Efex is great. But, also consider the latest version of Exposure. It also has a lot of B&W film presets, plus customization capabilities. And, the latest version has borders and some pretty cool 'aging' effects. Silver Efex, though, does have the very useful 'u-point' feature.

Try the trials for both. I have both and don't really have a favorite. At this point, though, if i HAD to choose one or the other, i'd go with Exposure. It's more versatile with both color and BW (plus Polaroid, cross-processing, vintage, etc.), and the new engine/effects are really nice.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 14:27.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.