Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Leica Screw Mount / LTM Cameras

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

90mm f/4 Fat Elmar
Old 06-07-2012   #1
Crazy Fedya
Registered User
 
Crazy Fedya's Avatar
 
Crazy Fedya is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 747
90mm f/4 Fat Elmar

Hello, everybody.
I have a chance to pick up this lens for about $500. Is it good? Worth it? Comes with original caps, has some haze and some scratches.
__________________
Thanks,
Sam.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2012   #2
nanthor
Registered User
 
nanthor is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 191
I have one and it's a very nice lens, very sharp and with a good bokeh, of course. I also really like the size and ergonomics of it, and it takes 39mm filters. $500 would be a great price if in excellent shape. I think with both haze AND scratches, it's too high. I paid about $650 for mine with mint glass and excellent cosmetics. The reason I say around is because it was a package deal, I figure 650 of it was the Fat elmar. It is bound to take good pictures even with the blemishes but if you want it you should be able to get the price down some. The haze can probably be taken care of but the scratches are forever.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2012   #3
roundg
Registered User
 
roundg's Avatar
 
roundg is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 776
forgive me, but it's the first time that I heard about a fat elmar 90/4.What's it?
__________________
Greeting from Singapore,
Robin
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2012   #4
Crazy Fedya
Registered User
 
Crazy Fedya's Avatar
 
Crazy Fedya is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 747
It's the first version of 90mm f/4 Elmar made only for 2 years. Approx. 2500 lenses made between 1931-1932.
__________________
Thanks,
Sam.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2012   #5
roundg
Registered User
 
roundg's Avatar
 
roundg is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Fedya View Post
It's the first version of 90mm f/4 Elmar made only for 2 years. Approx. 2500 lenses made between 1931-1932.
Oh, thank for the information.
__________________
Greeting from Singapore,
Robin
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2012   #6
nanthor
Registered User
 
nanthor is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 191
Actually, it's the 90mm tele-elmarit that's dubbed the "fat" version. I assumed that is the lens you were considering. Bob.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2012   #7
Crazy Fedya
Registered User
 
Crazy Fedya's Avatar
 
Crazy Fedya is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 747
No, it's actually Fat Elmar 90mm f/4
__________________
Thanks,
Sam.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2012   #8
nanthor
Registered User
 
nanthor is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 191
I've searched and found the 90mm fat elmar now, didn't know there was one. Please disregard my posts, they have nothing to do with that lens. Bob.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2012   #9
nanthor
Registered User
 
nanthor is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 191
At least I'm helping keep you at the top of the posts! Bob.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2012   #10
Crazy Fedya
Registered User
 
Crazy Fedya's Avatar
 
Crazy Fedya is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 747
Thanks.
__________________
Thanks,
Sam.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-08-2012   #11
Crazy Fedya
Registered User
 
Crazy Fedya's Avatar
 
Crazy Fedya is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 747
Anyone else?
__________________
Thanks,
Sam.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2012   #12
Red Robin
It Is What It Is
 
Red Robin's Avatar
 
Red Robin is online now
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wrinkle City, Fla.
Age: 63
Posts: 541
Anyone have the S/N spread on this lens? I have a 90/4 but would not call it "fat".
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-02-2012   #13
chris7521
RF User
 
chris7521's Avatar
 
chris7521 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kodiak Is, Alaska
Posts: 352
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Robin View Post
Anyone have the S/N spread on this lens? I have a 90/4 but would not call it "fat".
There's no mistaking "Fat" http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-..._f%3D_9_cm_1:4
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-02-2012   #14
FrankS
Registered User
 
FrankS's Avatar
 
FrankS is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Great White North
Age: 56
Posts: 17,157
So it's higher value is due more to its rarity than its imaging, compared to the subsequent 90f4 Elmar?
__________________
“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” – quote
I myself am made entirely of faults, stitched together with good intentions. -quote
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-05-2012   #15
philipus
brighterfool brighterday
 
philipus's Avatar
 
philipus is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sweden & Netherlands
Posts: 346
Leicashop in Vienna sell several for between 400-1300 Euros depending on condition. Red Dot in London has one for 499 GBP.

Puts e-book notes that the "optical performance hardly changed" even though there were numerous changes in the lens appearance.

Nice coincidence that I saw this thread today because this morning I brought with me my II with the, I guess, slim or ordinary 9cm Elmar which I like very much.
__________________
philipus.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 3 Weeks Ago   #16
littlefields
Registered User
 
littlefields is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 20
Hi,
Does anyone know how many un-serialized, rangefinder-coupled "Fat Elmar" lenses were made? Also, is the correct cap for this lens bakelite or black enamel? I bought one of these a few days ago....no cleaning marks, but lots of haze. It's off to Youxin Ye for a cleaning next week. Thanks in advance for any information.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:36.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.