Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > CSC : Compact System Cameras - > Fuji X-Pro1 / X-E1

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Zach Arias x-pro1 review
Old 04-11-2012   #1
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,395
Zach Arias x-pro1 review

He's a great guy and I thoroughly enjoyed his review. Very honest. Enjoy.

http://zackarias.com/for-photographe...iew/#more-3080
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2012   #2
yossarian123
Sam I Am
 
yossarian123's Avatar
 
yossarian123 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Age: 36
Posts: 604
site is down for me.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2012   #3
j.scooter
Registered User
 
j.scooter's Avatar
 
j.scooter is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Toronto-ish
Posts: 829
worked for me.
Thanks for posting, it was good read.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2012   #4
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalintrigue View Post
Srsly.....


?

tencharacters
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2012   #5
digitalintrigue
modern vintage
 
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by gavinlg View Post
?

tencharacters
Actually, I was channeling Zach...he used that spelling
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2012   #6
digitalintrigue
modern vintage
 
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,286
Srsly.....
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2012   #7
mouren
Registered User
 
mouren is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by gavinlg View Post
He's a great guy and I thoroughly enjoyed his review. Very honest. Enjoy.

http://zackarias.com/for-photographe...iew/#more-3080
omg, I have been waiting on his review for like a month now, checking his site every other day.

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2012   #8
kbg32
neo-romanticist
 
kbg32's Avatar
 
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,151
All these reviews of the X-Pro1 make my head spin! One is bad, one is good....ugh.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2012   #9
Jobin
Registered User
 
Jobin's Avatar
 
Jobin is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbg32 View Post
All these reviews of the X-Pro1 make my head spin! One is bad, one is good....ugh.
It's easier to not want one at all
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2012   #10
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbg32 View Post
All these reviews of the X-Pro1 make my head spin! One is bad, one is good....ugh.
The way I see it, if you use a DSLR or whatever gear frequently and don't pine for a smaller/specialized little RF style camera with autofocus, don't worry about the x-pro1 or the x100. You won't need/like them.

If you use a DSLR a lot and hate lugging it around, pass up opportunities to take it with you to places because it spoils the moment having it on your shoulder, and don't care for manual focusing (e.g. - you just want a small/light camera with a real viewfinder), then you will like the x-pro1/x100.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2012   #11
jippiejee
Registered User
 
jippiejee's Avatar
 
jippiejee is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 595
I wouldn't call this a truly independant review, knowing Fuji actually donated him the camera and lenses. I like his enthusiasm, but he should start with the disclaimer: "Fuji just paid me $3000 dollar to review their new xpro1 set... read on in case you still think me trustworthy now".
__________________
flickr
flickriver


Leica: D2 / CL / X1 / M4-P / M8
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2012   #12
Audii-Dudii
Registered User
 
Audii-Dudii is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by jippiejee View Post
I wouldn't call this a truly independant review, knowing Fuji actually donated him the camera and lenses. I like his enthusiasm, but he should start with the disclaimer: "Fuji just paid me $3000 dollar to review their new xpro1 set... read on in case you still think me trustworthy now".
Actually, as I read it, he more or less did exactly that: Also, let me state for the record that I was hired by FujiFilm Middle East, and was paid in camera gear and cash to take this machine for a joy ride. The first thing I said before taking this gig, though, was if I was going to blog about it they needed to understand that I would say whatever I wanted to about it. The good folks at Fuji said they expected nothing less. Especially after my x-100 review. It was that review that put me on their radar in the first place and it was the good folks at Gulf Photo Plus that convinced them they should send me to India. I’ll be doing some stuff with Fuji North America as well.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2012   #13
jippiejee
Registered User
 
jippiejee's Avatar
 
jippiejee is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 595
Ah, they also paid him tickets to India.
__________________
flickr
flickriver


Leica: D2 / CL / X1 / M4-P / M8
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2012   #14
robert blu
Registered User
 
robert blu's Avatar
 
robert blu is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Italy
Age: 64
Posts: 3,162
i find the Zack report interesting. He explains honestly how he did get the camera from Fuji. The photo posted are good, and where someone could have doubts about this camera (autofocus speed?) Zack made a clear statement. I think anyway that the only way to know if this can be your (our?) camera is to test it personally. I own a camera which was reported to have a very slow autofocus and when I bought it I realized it was true. But I also realized that I could work with it, using some "tricks" from the old before autofocus days. Shall I buy an x1 pro? Don't know, first I will look for a way to try it!
robert
__________________
Remember: today is the Day !
from Ruth Bernhard recipe for a long and happy life


the quiet photographer's blog


My RFF photos and my albums on RFF
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2012   #15
furcafe
Registered User
 
furcafe's Avatar
 
furcafe is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 3,832
I think it was reasonably honest review. He's the only person I've read or heard from who has raved about the (IMHO, useless) "Q" button!
__________________
Five a Second. Chicago's Bell & Howell Co. (cameras) announced that it would put on sale this fall the world's most expensive still camera. Its "Foton" will take five 35-mm. pictures a second, sell for $700. Bell & Howell, which has found that "families of both low and high incomes now spend over $550" for movie equipment, hopes to sell 20,000 Fotons a year.

--Facts And Figures, Time magazine, Monday, October 4, 1948
My Photoblog

My Flickr stream

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2012   #16
Luke_Y
Registered User
 
Luke_Y is offline
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 35
WRT the "Q" menu. I find it convenient, I just wish it was editable. There are a few items I would replace with more convenient items.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2012   #17
furcafe
Registered User
 
furcafe's Avatar
 
furcafe is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 3,832
I don't disagree; I probably should have written "useless as currently programmed." Right now, I keep hitting it accidentally because it's where my thumb thinks the AE-L/AF-L lock or some other button ought to be.

Aside from the ergonomics, I understand that it's supposed to be a kind of shortcut button, but, as is, it pulls up 16 options, which still seems like a ridiculous # to an old fogey like me & not much of an edit compared to the regular "Menu OK" button.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke_Y View Post
WRT the "Q" menu. I find it convenient, I just wish it was editable. There are a few items I would replace with more convenient items.
__________________
Five a Second. Chicago's Bell & Howell Co. (cameras) announced that it would put on sale this fall the world's most expensive still camera. Its "Foton" will take five 35-mm. pictures a second, sell for $700. Bell & Howell, which has found that "families of both low and high incomes now spend over $550" for movie equipment, hopes to sell 20,000 Fotons a year.

--Facts And Figures, Time magazine, Monday, October 4, 1948
My Photoblog

My Flickr stream

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2012   #18
ninetwentynine
Registered User
 
ninetwentynine is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 14
good ole 'Zach Arais'.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2012   #19
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninetwentynine View Post
good ole 'Zach Arais'.
What ever do you mean?
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2012   #20
anthony_semone
Registered User
 
anthony_semone's Avatar
 
anthony_semone is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 168
so are they any of you all who require a minimum of 2.50+ diopter correction using this camera with no difficulty? Or, is there a workaround?
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2012   #21
PhotoMat
Registered User
 
PhotoMat's Avatar
 
PhotoMat is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 372
While I have no direct experience using diopters, the Bessa ones are supposed to fit the X-Pro 1.

http://checkout.cameraquest.com/voig...-eyepieces.htm
__________________
www.natural-light.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-2012   #22
nandemofoto
Registered User
 
nandemofoto's Avatar
 
nandemofoto is offline
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Nagoya, Japan
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by anthony_semone View Post
so are they any of you all who require a minimum of 2.50+ diopter correction using this camera with no difficulty? Or, is there a workaround?
I'm using an eyepiece from Nikon FM2 on my Xpro1. The Nikon FM line had quite many different diopter correction eyepieces, they can be purchase on the bay for about 20$
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #23
hub
Crazy French
 
hub's Avatar
 
hub is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Montréal, QC
Age: 38
Posts: 178
I have an X-Pro1 (paid with my own money), I have read Zach review and I do believe he is honest. The fact that he goes at great length to put up the disclaimer is already a good sense of honesty.

And I love the Q button as it is, and tend to dislike the placement of the AE-L/AF-L that I end up always missing.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-2012   #24
furcafe
Registered User
 
furcafe's Avatar
 
furcafe is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 3,832
Ha, I would love to see a firmware update that allowed me to switch the function(s) of those 2 buttons.

Different strokes . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by hub View Post

And I love the Q button as it is, and tend to dislike the placement of the AE-L/AF-L that I end up always missing.
__________________
Five a Second. Chicago's Bell & Howell Co. (cameras) announced that it would put on sale this fall the world's most expensive still camera. Its "Foton" will take five 35-mm. pictures a second, sell for $700. Bell & Howell, which has found that "families of both low and high incomes now spend over $550" for movie equipment, hopes to sell 20,000 Fotons a year.

--Facts And Figures, Time magazine, Monday, October 4, 1948
My Photoblog

My Flickr stream

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-2012   #25
Spyro
Registered User
 
Spyro is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC, Oz
Posts: 798
Quote:
Originally Posted by furcafe View Post
Ha, I would love to see a firmware update that allowed me to switch the function(s) of those 2 buttons.
and then fuji would have to post to every user stenciled stickers to change the markings on each button?
__________________
Flickr
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:16.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.