Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Fixed Lens Advanced Compacts > Fuji X Series > X100 Images

X100 Images Share Your X100 Images Here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Oh my! (new videos) and sample images!
Old 02-07-2011   #1
videogamemaker
icelandic_photographer
 
videogamemaker is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reykjavik, Iceland
Posts: 290
Oh my! (new videos) and sample images!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=lP083Q0zv14

The AF, aperture closing, and shutter speed look lighting fast in this one! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqLCU...layer_embedded

And tons of jpegs, though low res web sized. I can't be sure, but it looks like this version doesn't have that corner softness the ones from the norwegian sample had in the tree branches.

http://brandonremler.blogspot.com/20...00-videos.html

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandon remler
The FinePix X100 is a wonderful camera to work with on the streets. It’s the camera I’ve waited for for years. My standard camera has been a 5D or 5D II with a 28mm 1.8 for general shooting and vacations (light set-up to run out with). Finally the X100 comes along and I have a professional camera with the speed, ergonomics, and performance I can rely on. I'm not saying ditch the DSLR - I am saying I now have a pro camera I can rely on and not carry a DSLR when it is overkill for the activity.

Final version cameras are not in the USA but the initial prototype units are amazing. The sharpness is way over expectations and it has led me to having to send in my 16-35L lens due to its soft look when compared to the X100 (effective 35mm lens).

The image at the bottom shows the set-up for shooting the two videos on this blog. I suppose there are already tons and tons of videos and images of the camera so I think I’m done with the tech stuff unless there is a specific request which makes sense to me.

One of the best features is the near silent leaf shutter. The soft click is a luxurious sound and feel which empowers you to shoot more and raise your game. Those of you who have bought a new lens you’ve pined for in the past know that feeling of “power” when you get the new glass on the body.

All images are now from the jpeg file.
Can’t wait for it to hit our shores around March 25th.
If someone knows how to embed Youtube videos directly in the post, please let me know.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #2
videogamemaker
icelandic_photographer
 
videogamemaker is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reykjavik, Iceland
Posts: 290
The speed from that 2nd video, if it's anything to go by, puts all my fears from the earlier shown stuff at ease. It looks much faster than the one from fujiguys, and seems to be including the AF speed, which looks quite fast as well.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #3
BMacW
Registered User
 
BMacW is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 90
He obviously knows the Fuji marketing lady Kayce. So I take it as a sign that Fuji is ready to unleash this baby for a slightly bigger masses for testing/reviewing.

Steve Huff says he might get one soon as well.

This makes the waiting bit a lot more tolerable.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-08-2011   #4
BMacW
Registered User
 
BMacW is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMacW View Post
He obviously knows the Fuji marketing lady Kayce. So I take it as a sign that Fuji is ready to unleash this baby for a slightly bigger masses for testing/reviewing.

Steve Huff says he might get one soon as well.

This makes the waiting bit a lot more tolerable.
Now I feel like a real wise ass
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #5
urje
Registered User
 
urje is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 17
I'm surprised (and a little disappointed) focusing apparently isn't internal. I hope the lens cap isn't connected to the moving part and protects it well, so I'll be able to throw it in a bag and put some pressure on it. The Pentax 21 limited is awful in that department.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #6
videogamemaker
icelandic_photographer
 
videogamemaker is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reykjavik, Iceland
Posts: 290
Quote:
Originally Posted by urje View Post
I'm surprised (and a little disappointed) focusing apparently isn't internal. I hope the lens cap isn't connected to the moving part and protects it well, so I'll be able to throw it in a bag and put some pressure on it. The Pentax 21 limited is awful in that department.
From what I can see, the moving part doesn't push past the metal ring around the outside, so the cap should fit flush with that metal ring, no risk of contacting the moving part.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMacW View Post

Steve Huff says he might get one soon as well.
Not disbelieving you, but where did you hear this? His site doesn't seem to mention it. Twitter?
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #7
BMacW
Registered User
 
BMacW is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by videogamemaker View Post
Not disbelieving you, but where did you hear this? His site doesn't seem to mention it. Twitter?
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2011/0...d-new-reviews/

Quote:
I’m also hoping that I will be one of the first with the Fuji X100 and I believe I will be
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #8
videogamemaker
icelandic_photographer
 
videogamemaker is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reykjavik, Iceland
Posts: 290
Hmm, from the sounds of that he just means he will get one right when they come out?
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #9
BMacW
Registered User
 
BMacW is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by videogamemaker View Post
Hmm, from the sounds of that he just means he will get one right when they come out?
Yeah, Now that I reread it, it does seem like he will only get a production model upon release.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #10
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,392
Looks really fast and responsive. I expected no less to be honest. Those samples are so lackluster though - I really wish someone would take some portrait shots of someone from 4-8 feet away at f2.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #11
Pickett Wilson
Registered User
 
Pickett Wilson's Avatar
 
Pickett Wilson is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,373
Amazing. A 5DII killer for $1,000 bucks.
__________________
______________________________________________
"There is something rather sad about a truckload of caviar"

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...0&ppuser=28005
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #12
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,392
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pickett Wilson View Post
Amazing. A 5DII killer for $1,000 bucks.
Lets not get too hasty!
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #13
videogamemaker
icelandic_photographer
 
videogamemaker is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reykjavik, Iceland
Posts: 290
Quote:
Originally Posted by fdigital View Post
Lets not get too hasty!
lol, yeah even with no AA filter at all, I don't think a 12 mp can ever out resolve a 21 mp camera, especially if comparing this lens to the 16-35mmL on the 5D. Now having the prints be similar up to a certain size I could see.

I think it does look sharper than my 5D I, the earlier full resolution samples, that is.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #14
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,392
Quote:
Originally Posted by videogamemaker View Post
I think it does look sharper than my 5D I, the earlier full resolution samples, that is.
I'd disagree with that, but those samples were pretty average. The 5d still punches way above it's weight for IQ.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #15
lhotse
Registered User
 
lhotse is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by fdigital View Post
I'd disagree with that, but those samples were pretty average. The 5d still punches way above it's weight for IQ.
agreed - if this thing even comes close to my 5d I for IQ I'll be seriously happy
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #16
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is online now
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,446
The question I have to ask is does the Fuji Kool Aid taste similar to the Leica brand that seems quite popular around here?

__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-08-2011   #17
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
The question I have to ask is does the Fuji Kool Aid taste similar to the Leica brand that seems quite popular around here?

I hope so, or I'll be disappointed...
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #18
PatrickT
New Rangefinder User
 
PatrickT's Avatar
 
PatrickT is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 28
Posts: 870
Interesting videos, but to be honest, the photos on his site look like garbage. Either that is because they are un-interesting and severely compressed, I'm not sure.

But yeah...if this camera can match my 5D classic's image quality...I'm in
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #19
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,288
How many aperture blades did that look to be? 9?
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #20
ElectroWNED
Registered User
 
ElectroWNED is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 605
those sample pictures of the bike and telephone look like something coming out of an iPhone
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-08-2011   #21
JoeV
Pinhole Shooter
 
JoeV's Avatar
 
JoeV is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Posts: 1,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElectroWNED View Post
those sample pictures of the bike and telephone look like something coming out of an iPhone
So, you're saying that's a good thing, right? Because the iPhone is selling like -- hotcakes! If Fuji sold as many X100s as iPhones, that'd make it a best-selling camera.

I'd also say that any camera that can be used as conveniently as a cell-phone camera makes it a good candidate for street photography, so again your comparison is an unintended compliment.

~Joe
__________________
"If your eye is clear, your whole body will be full of light"

A Series of Meaningless Photographs
My Writing Blog
My latest book
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-08-2011   #22
ElectroWNED
Registered User
 
ElectroWNED is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeV View Post
So, you're saying that's a good thing, right? Because the iPhone is selling like -- hotcakes! If Fuji sold as many X100s as iPhones, that'd make it a best-selling camera.

I'd also say that any camera that can be used as conveniently as a cell-phone camera makes it a good candidate for street photography, so again your comparison is an unintended compliment.

~Joe
I'll keep my $20 XA and $9 a month slider phone, thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-08-2011   #23
cidereye
filmista
 
cidereye's Avatar
 
cidereye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cider Country, England
Age: 49
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElectroWNED View Post
I'll keep my $20 XA and $9 a month slider phone, thanks
Hehe, I was thinking the same thing especially after viewing the files from the X100. I mean, c'mon it was NEVER, ever going to live up to the extreme hype was it?

The shots don't even come close to something like a Lumix GF1 which can be had used for almost 1/3 of the X100's UK price and the GF1 is several years old to boot. Sure the X100 looks great, retro and all that but if you want a decent retro looking camera go buy a Rollei 35 for £50 I reckon.
__________________
"What's the point of getting killed if you've got the wrong exposure?" Don McCullin
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-11-2011   #24
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,713
Quote:
Originally Posted by cidereye View Post
The shots don't even come close to something like a Lumix GF1 which can be had used for almost 1/3 of the X100's UK price and the GF1 is several years old to boot. Sure the X100 looks great, retro and all that but if you want a decent retro looking camera go buy a Rollei 35 for £50 I reckon.
Wow, a few lame shots on a company website and you jumped to that conclusion>?
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2011   #25
_larky
Registered User
 
_larky's Avatar
 
_larky is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 635
Was the criteria for getting one of these being that you had to take poor photos? It seems that way.

Until I see for full on street stuff, as in people captured in motion, doing stuff, in tricky lighting conditions, I'm not buying. The more they release, the less I seem to want it.

"those sample pictures of the bike and telephone look like something coming out of an iPhone" - exactly.

Last edited by _larky : 02-07-2011 at 23:45.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:20.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.