View Single Post

Old 01-22-2012   #11
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
 
rxmd's Avatar
 
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 5,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by DamenS View Post
Actually he IS interested in that as it was his argument to that effect (that a 135mm equivalent field of view is too long for portraiture) in another thread (and difficulties with Rangefinder coupling at that length) which led directly to him creating this poll. Please, see the thread below:

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...64#post1794364

in which he stated that a 90mm lens on a 1.5x crop camera such as the NEX is far too long to be used for portraiture:
In the light of that thread, it seems that the burning question for the OP seems to have been his disagreement with 135mm being called a "classic portrait lens"
("give me a break, the classic portrait lenses are 75 to 105--is that controversial now?")
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
  Reply With Quote