<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Rangefinderforum.com</title>
		<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums</link>
		<description>Rangefinderforum.com is a site for Rangefinder Camera enthusiasts</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:06:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Minolta Hi-Matic 7s RF Alignment / Setting</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133004&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:55:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image in RF way out of vertical alignment.  Horizontal maybe out too (difficult to be sure due to vertical problem).  Can I adjust this myself, or do...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Image in RF way out of vertical alignment.  Horizontal maybe out too (difficult to be sure due to vertical problem).  Can I adjust this myself, or do I need a professional repair shop? Appreciate any help!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=23">Other RF</category>
			<dc:creator>tfcrork</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133004</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The $40 Challenge - The Contenders</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133000&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:01:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi again everybody,

So here is the promised thread about our $40 (everything included) camera challenge contenders. In this thread we can all post...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi again everybody,<br />
<br />
So here is the promised thread about our $40 (everything included) camera challenge contenders. In this thread we can all post our acquisitions. In order to make it fun, post a photo of the camera you bought, a link to the auction (or a screenshot) or website you bought it from. <br />
<br />
Also required is a photograph you took with your acquisition. The honor system rules here, so don't post a photo taken with your M3 and tell us it's coming from the Brownie Hawkeye you just got :)<br />
<br />
I have not received my camera, yet, and I guess many others are in the same boat, so this thread will be open for at least another two weeks. <br />
<br />
The more people participate, the more fun it will be.<br />
<br />
After that I will post a poll and we can all vote for who got the best/most fun deal.<br />
<br />
For everybody that does not know what I'm talking about or what the rules are, here is the original thread:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132625" target="_blank">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...d.php?t=132625</a><br />
<br />
Here the main rules again:<br />
1. It has to be a film camera<br />
2. It can't be an SLR<br />
3. It has to take photos, so it can't be totally broken<br />
4. It can't be an autofocus camera<br />
5. The camera has to be $40 or less including shipping, taxes etc.<br />
<br />
Cheers!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=27">Rangefinder Photography Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>archeophoto</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133000</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bay 2/II 3.5F Lens Caps</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132998&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:55:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi all, 
Trying once and for all to sort out a lens cap for my 3.5F. 

The original Rollei caps are hideously expensive and even the aftermarket ones...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi all, <br />
Trying once and for all to sort out a lens cap for my 3.5F. <br />
<br />
The original Rollei caps are hideously expensive and even the aftermarket ones are a bit steep. Additionally, I have a UV filter mounted permanently on the taking lens, which makes the standard caps impossible. <br />
<br />
The best solution I can think of is a separate cap for each lens - would this work? I don't have any small caps to hand to try for sure. <br />
<br />
Any suggestions/experiences on what to do? I know I could take the UV filter off but that's a bit of a faff everytime.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=108">TLR Forum - Twin Lens Reflex</category>
			<dc:creator>freecom2</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132998</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Black Jupiter-8 aperture ring alignment</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132996&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:30:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello all,

I'm just getting back into FSU kit after foolishly selling my Kiev 4A. I just bought a Fed 2 which I'm very excited about.

Anyway, I...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hello all,<br />
<br />
I'm just getting back into FSU kit after foolishly selling my Kiev 4A. I just bought a Fed 2 which I'm very excited about.<br />
<br />
Anyway, I have a black Jupiter-8 which works fine, but the aperture ring is misaligned a few mm to the left. This means that at maximum aperture the marker is just to the right of the f/2.0 marker and at minimum aperture the marker is on f/16 rather than f/22.<br />
<br />
Would it be a mammoth task to fix? To be honest I don't like how the front element turns when focusing or how loose the aperture ring is, so might swap it for a silver model.<br />
<br />
Thanks all!</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">
	
	

	
	
	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/themes/graphite/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=95940&amp;d=1369258189">ForumRunner_20130522_222946.jpg</a> (39.9 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/themes/graphite/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=95941&amp;d=1369258227">ForumRunner_20130522_223025.jpg</a> (33.1 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	
	
	
	
	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=34">FSU  Former Soviet Union RF</category>
			<dc:creator>lrochfort</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132996</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MLU and viewfinder blacking out</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132995&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:39:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>OK so I have a Rolleiflex that I use for portraits.

I want something longer and so I am looking into many different options but .....

Is there some...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>OK so I have a Rolleiflex that I use for portraits.<br />
<br />
I want something longer and so I am looking into many different options but .....<br />
<br />
Is there some sort of viewfinder attachment for 120 SLR's?  I shoot available light so I need to use slow shutter speeds and hence MLU is a necessity for me.  However, I really like to keep my sight on the subject at all times, especially upon release of the shutter so I'm wondering if such a device exists.  There are plenty of niched accessories for Rolleiflex TLRs so maybe something exists for Hasselblad/Rolleiflex SL66/etc.<br />
<br />
Else, there are mutars, tele-rollei's, and mamiya tlrs.<br />
<br />
Maybe a little off topic but I have also considered LF (4x5 or 8x10) but the same issue arises but I believe it is common for some models to have viewfinder attachments right?  As many are rangefinders.  I would focus with the groundglass and then switch to the viewfinder upon releasing the shutter.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=126">SLRs - the unRF</category>
			<dc:creator>msbarnes</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132995</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>There are no Professional Photographers!</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132994&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:30:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>More nonsense from Yahoo

http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2013/05/22/yahoos-mayer-no-such-thing-as-professional-photographers/</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>More nonsense from Yahoo<br />
<br />
<a href="http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2013/05/22/yahoos-mayer-no-such-thing-as-professional-photographers/" target="_blank">http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell...photographers/</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=110">Photography General Interest</category>
			<dc:creator>marcr1230</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132994</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>rolleiflex tele mutars</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132993&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Anyone have experience with these things?

I love my Flex but I want something a bit longer...I know that these are not the best solution as adding a...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Anyone have experience with these things?<br />
<br />
I love my Flex but I want something a bit longer...I know that these are not the best solution as adding a piece of glass dilutes the image quality.<br />
<br />
ofcourse there are plenty of other alternatives but what is the experience with these things?  Is the drop in image quality noticeable? I don't find a difference with rolleinar's but I've never looked very hard either.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=108">TLR Forum - Twin Lens Reflex</category>
			<dc:creator>msbarnes</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132993</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Leica IIIg Frustration</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132992&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:35:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I have just come into possession of a really pretty IIIg, from another RfF member.  I had never held one before, and I like its features.

When the...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have just come into possession of a really pretty IIIg, from another RfF member.  I had never held one before, and I like its features.<br />
<br />
When the camera arrived, I noticed that the fast shutter speed dial was way out of alignment -- the dial appeared to be at least 1/4 rotation off from lining up with the correct speeds.<br />
<br />
I figured that maybe the three grub screws securing the dial maybe were loose, or perhaps the dial had been removed and reinstalled hastily.  So I loosened the screws, aligned it properly and tightened up the screws.<br />
<br />
But the problem resurfaced immediately.  Each release of the shutter caused the dial to drift off out of alignment -- no doubt because of the momentum from the spinning of the dial when the shutter is released, followed by sudden cessation of rotation.<br />
<br />
Removing the dial entirely was a surprise -- there is only a very thin flange that the dial rests on, and the grub screws don't actually engage head on with the flange surface but rather against a beveled edge of the flange.  If the screws' pointed ends were able to dig into the surface, there might be no drifting at all. Seems like a design flaw to me!  But I've never heard of this problem before with this camera, or with any Barnack Leica, for that matter.  Suggestions?  Maybe the grub screws need to be slightly longer?<br />
<br />
I should emphasize that the seller is willing to stand behind this, and it may require sending this off to the guy who CLA'd it last year to make it right.  But before doing anything further, I wanted to see whether others had encountered the problem, and how they cured it.  Thanks.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=116">Repair / Camera Care</category>
			<dc:creator>KoNickon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132992</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>W/NW: Color Landscapes</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132991&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Steptoe Butte
The Palouse - Eastern WA
D700 16-35 @ 35
200 F/4

Thanks for looking.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Steptoe Butte<br />
The Palouse - Eastern WA<br />
D700 16-35 @ 35<br />
200 F/4<br />
<br />
Thanks for looking.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">
	
	

	
	
	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/themes/graphite/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=95939&amp;d=1369249684">CLR_Steptoe-Butte-RFF01.jpg</a> (189.3 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	
	
	
	
	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=62">W/NW Words no Words.</category>
			<dc:creator>rpsawin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132991</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Silicon Blue Cell 'filtered' - how?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132990&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:59:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[So I've been reading up on replacing selenium cells (in cameras and meters) with silicon photodiodes.

 Problem is, I keep seeing references to how...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>So I've been reading up on replacing selenium cells (in cameras and meters) with silicon photodiodes.<br />
<br />
 Problem is, I keep seeing references to how it's biased heavily towards infrared/visible red.<br />
<br />
 If I were to perform the modification, I'd like the spectral response to be at least somewhat accurate.<br />
 Does anyone know the exact characteristics of the 'blue' filter used over the cells? Any spectral sensitivity experts out there like to hazard a guess?<br />
<br />
 <a href="http://tomtiger.home.xs4all.nl/index.html" target="_blank">THIS</a> link (under 'Zenit Repair') states that this kind of cell works in lots of light conditions unfiltered. Should I just stop worrying and jump in?<br />
<br />
 Thanks for any input</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=116">Repair / Camera Care</category>
			<dc:creator>Rudybustamante</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132990</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nikon CoolPix P7700</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132988&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:23:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Does this camera qualify as an Advanced Compact?  It's much more capable than my old Panasonic DMC-TZ3.
 
PF]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Does this camera qualify as an Advanced Compact?  It's much more capable than my old Panasonic DMC-TZ3.<br />
 <br />
PF</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=187">Other Digital Advanced Fixed Lens Compacts</category>
			<dc:creator>farlymac</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132988</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>21 vs 25</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132987&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:36:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Regardless of the AOV and spacing with other lenses you own, which of the f/2.8 wides, 21 and 25, would you consider as the "better" lens, in terms...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Regardless of the AOV and spacing with other lenses you own, which of the f/2.8 wides, 21 and 25, would you consider as the &quot;better&quot; lens, in terms of sharpness, drawing style, correction for aberrations... etc. Can you please elaborate on your choice? Thank you!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=55">Zeiss Ikon ZM</category>
			<dc:creator>EdwardKaraa</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132987</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Polaroid Conversions</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132983&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>If any of you have dealt with Nate from Polaroid Conversions, there is a nice article about him on...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>If any of you have dealt with Nate from Polaroid Conversions, there is a nice article about him on SnapIt/SeeIt.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://snapitseeit.com/vendor-spotlight-polaroid-conversions/" target="_blank">http://snapitseeit.com/vendor-spotli...d-conversions/</a><br />
<br />
I have a 110 A/B conversion from him.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=125">Lomo / Diana / Holga / Pinhole / Polaroids</category>
			<dc:creator>3rdtrick</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132983</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>an absolute statement</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132982&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:38:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>i think the only things that ultimately matter in photography are timing and perspective. everything else is opinion (or nostalgia... or...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>i think the only things that ultimately matter in photography are timing and perspective. everything else is opinion (or nostalgia... or masturbation... or...).<br />
<br />
i'm saying this, but i also think that absolute statements like the above are always just a means to convey an idea (or maybe to bring one's feet back to the ground) and should not be taken too seriously in all their absoluteness. i like (intelligent) radical statements though. and now i'm just blabbering.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=194">Simon Says -- SimonSawSunlight Photo Technique</category>
			<dc:creator>SimonSawSunlight</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132982</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>2013 Jan - Brussels, Beligium</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132981&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:12:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Just like to share some pictures taken from a trip earlier this year. Unfortunately I didn't spare much time to scan and touch up all taken from that...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Just like to share some pictures taken from a trip earlier this year. Unfortunately I didn't spare much time to scan and touch up all taken from that trip. The set will be updated as I go.<br />
<br />
All are taken with film and rangefinder gears, my beloved combo.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/38567698@N05/sets/72157633597921690/" target="_blank">http://www.flickr.com/photos/3856769...7633597921690/</a><br />
<br />
Sorry I don't take note of technical setup (camera/lens/exposures) when I shoot, if you want to know, I sure can recall from memory for you.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10">Leica M Film Cameras</category>
			<dc:creator>jonwo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132981</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
