<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Rangefinderforum.com</title>
		<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums</link>
		<description>Rangefinderforum.com is a site for Rangefinder Camera enthusiasts</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:08:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Mobile browsers.</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133036&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:52:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[As with all "upgrades", there are good things and bad. I usually visit this forum on an android phone but my usual browser has been dumbed down to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>As with all &quot;upgrades&quot;, there are good things and bad. I usually visit this forum on an android phone but my usual browser has been dumbed down to the point where it is useless ! Opera you have lost one customer ... The answer to my quest for a new mobile friend ? Dolphin. Ten out of ten.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=110">Photography General Interest</category>
			<dc:creator>John Bragg</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133036</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Panny New GX with tiltable View Finder</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133035&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:05:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Not that I am interested in the camera.  But the implementation of the EVF, if true, is very interesting indeed.  EVF without OMD hump, located on...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Not that I am interested in the camera.  But the implementation of the EVF, if true, is very interesting indeed.  EVF without OMD hump, located on the side, and still have flash.  Now that is refreshing.<br />
<br />
Oh, and it will have in body IS.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-the-dreamcamera-will-become-true-new-gx-has-in-body-is-and-titlable-evf/" target="_blank">http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-the-drea...-titlable-evf/</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=164">Micro 4/3 Cameras</category>
			<dc:creator>bwidjaja</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133035</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Winning photo of this year's Head On Portrait Prize (please read).]]></title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133034&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:05:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/life/more-than-meets-the-eye-20130523-2k35y.html</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/life/more-than-meets-the-eye-20130523-2k35y.html" target="_blank">http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/l...523-2k35y.html</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=110">Photography General Interest</category>
			<dc:creator>Lax Jought</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133034</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>x-e1 firmware update</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133033&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:57:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.fujifilm.com/support/digital_cameras/software/firmware/x/xe1/

for the new zoom!</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.fujifilm.com/support/digital_cameras/software/firmware/x/xe1/" target="_blank">http://www.fujifilm.com/support/digi...irmware/x/xe1/</a><br />
<br />
for the new zoom!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=173">Fuji X-Pro1 / X-E1</category>
			<dc:creator>back alley</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133033</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Red Dot Cameras = good</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133032&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:13:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[On the basis that we all spread the news about bad experiences, here's a good one:

My M6 had some banding at 1/1000th and a slightly off exposure...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>On the basis that we all spread the news about bad experiences, here's a good one:<br />
<br />
My M6 had some banding at 1/1000th and a slightly off exposure counter (no big deal but annoying).<br />
<br />
Red Dot Cameras on Old Street (London) took the camera back and not only fixed the issues, but gave it a full service. It has come back feeling beautiful.<br />
<br />
No charge, and no excessive waiting (it took a couple of weeks).<br />
<br />
So - if you need any work doing, or if you want to buy a second hand Leica from somebody you can trust, they should be on your list of go to guys.<br />
<br />
That is all   :)</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10">Leica M Film Cameras</category>
			<dc:creator>sjgslack</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133032</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Epson V500 vs Coolscan 5000 vs Panasonic G3 + macro lens</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133031&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:09:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[There's been a fair amount of chatter here about using digital cameras to scan negatives and how they are better/worse than the alternatives. Since...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>There's been a fair amount of chatter here about using digital cameras to scan negatives and how they are better/worse than the alternatives. Since I've been using all three of these of these devices for scanning film, I thought I'd post a comparison showing the resulting differences in output. I am using these items mostly on their default settings.  My perspective being that I really just want things to work as they come.  I don't have the time to buy different software or do tons of post-processing.  <br />
<br />
This test shot was taken with an OM1 and 35-70 3.5-4.5 zoom at close focus.  Film is Arista Premium 400 exposed at 400 and developed in Caffenol CH.  It was a thin negative, but all scanning methods could handle it. Maybe not the sharpest film/lens setup in the world, but hey, this is just round 1.  More examples will follow :D<br />
<br />
<img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7304/8779259063_aa01f7ea47_c.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Here is a crop from the V500, scanned at 4800 dpi. No Epson Scan sharpening and minimal if any sharpening applied:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3760/8785831464_2d8ecc1bd3_c.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Here is a crop from the full negative, taken with the Panasonic G3, and OM 50mm 3.5 macro:<br />
<img src="http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5329/8779255673_9095e25fae_c.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Finally, for fun, here is one taken with the Panasonic G3 and OM macro at 1:1 reproduction:<br />
<img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7391/8779256957_6b06ab0d20_c.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
It's no surprise the 1:1 macro shot is doing the best, sharp and at such a magnification that there's not much digital noise interfering with the grain.  Of course, when you  do the math, at 1:1 the 4/3 Panasonic G3 sensor is magnifying at something around 6000+ dpi if my math is correct (someone will probably correct me on this :rolleyes:)  Downside is that one would need to take 4 good, level shots and stitch them together to cover a full 35 mm neg.  Only worth it for the real keepers and requires a decent piece of software to do the mosaicking.<br />
<br />
Next best seems to be the G3 shot taken of the entire negative.  After cropping the top and bottom, it works out to 13mp.    This is how I tend to use my camera for scanning negatives.  While it's not lacking much detail from the 1:1 shot, I do see what looks like digital noise interfering with the grain, and it isn't very pretty.  This leads me to conclude that even for grainy 400 speed film, 13 mp is inadequate for properly recording all the detail and grain of a 35 mm frame. But in terms of printing, it would have to be a large one to notice this.<br />
<br />
Finally, in third, is the V500 scan, which I honestly thought did a surprisingly good job compared to my past experience with this scanner.  Maybe it likes this film more than others, we'll see.  Still present, however, is the dreaded V500 grain-obliterating &quot;smear&quot; that can only be corrected to a point by sharpening and/or image size reduction.<br />
<br />
The Coolscan 5000 comparison is coming...<br />
<br />
Larger images of the ones above can be seen on my <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/68243197@N04/sets/72157633582603921/" target="_blank">Flickr set</a><br />
<br />
Next up - color slide film</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=148">Scanners / Scanner Software</category>
			<dc:creator>Noll</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133031</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dropped my CL.</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133030&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:00:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Dropped my CL 1m onto concrete b/c I left my backpack open. :bang::bang::bang: Meter needle is stuck since, rf is out of whack. Off it goes to...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Dropped my CL 1m onto concrete b/c I left my backpack open. :bang::bang::bang: Meter needle is stuck since, rf is out of whack. Off it goes to repair. I am unhappy, because this could've been prevented.<br />
<br />
Note to self: always close backpack, especially when there's a camera inside.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=131">Leica M --  Leica CL</category>
			<dc:creator>efix</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133030</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[William Eggleston's Cameras]]></title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133029&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:59:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Take a look at this! wild, at least to me....
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324715704578481214024861412.html</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Take a look at this! wild, at least to me....<br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324715704578481214024861412.html" target="_blank">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...024861412.html</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=27">Rangefinder Photography Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>danielsterno</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133029</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Leica teases "Mini M"]]></title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133028&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:55:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://leicarumors.com/2013/05/23/new-leica-mini-m-camera-coming-on-june-11.aspx...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://leicarumors.com/2013/05/23/new-leica-mini-m-camera-coming-on-june-11.aspx/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LeicaRumors+%28LeicaRumors.com%29" target="_blank">http://leicarumors.com/2013/05/23/new-leica-mini-m-camera-coming-on-june-11.aspx</a> and <a href="http://en.leica-camera.com/home/" target="_blank">http://en.leica-camera.com/home/</a><br />
<br />
Anyone have any idea what they're up to?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=68"><![CDATA[Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M"]]></category>
			<dc:creator>efix</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133028</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MR4 Battery Solution...Thanks Jon Goodman</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133027&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:28:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Anyone got a Leica MR4 meter for your M-body? I have been shying away from anything that makes the M3 form bigger or bulkier and then I realized...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Anyone got a Leica MR4 meter for your M-body? I have been shying away from anything that makes the M3 form bigger or bulkier and then I realized after receiving an MR4 meter that walking around with a separate meter in hand was bulkier and less friendly than having a shoe-mount meter!<br />
 <br />
So, I had to find a battery for it...no, they won't let me get a mercury battery and yes, the wein cells are at B&amp;H. But, Jon Goodman has an adaptor that accepts the widely available 675 hearing aid batteries. I got one and it works perfectly!!!<br />
 <br />
The meter checks perfectly with the X1 's meter...everytime...indoors or out!<br />
I can't recommend Jon's adaptor any higher!!! If you are looking for a battery solution for a meter, then go for it!<br />
 <br />
I did and I am much better of for it.:D</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10">Leica M Film Cameras</category>
			<dc:creator>dave lackey</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133027</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Americamania</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133026&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:24:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi to you all.
Here are some pictures for your review.
More pictures here: www.robertofrieri.net (http://www.robertofrieri.net)
 
.
Attachment 95951...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi to you all.<br />
Here are some pictures for your review.<br />
More pictures here: <a href="http://www.robertofrieri.net" target="_blank"><font color="#0000ff">www.robertofrieri.net</font></a><br />
 <br />
.<br />
<a href="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=95951" target="_blank">Attachment 95951</a><br />
 <br />
.<br />
<a href="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=95952" target="_blank">Attachment 95952</a><br />
 <br />
.<br />
<a href="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=95953" target="_blank">Attachment 95953</a></div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">
	
	

	
	
	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/themes/graphite/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=95951&amp;d=1369315413">L1000752.jpg</a> (51.4 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/themes/graphite/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=95952&amp;d=1369315422">L1000756.jpg</a> (48.8 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/themes/graphite/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=95953&amp;d=1369315429">L1000768.jpg</a> (30.0 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	
	
	
	
	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=70">Critique / Salon / Picks / Most Views</category>
			<dc:creator>frieri</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133026</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rangefinder Patch Clarity</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133025&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:46:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>A year or so ago, I got rid of my modern Leicas (an MP and M7), and opted for a pair of older Leicas (M5s), because the little voice in my head said...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>A year or so ago, I got rid of my modern Leicas (an MP and M7), and opted for a pair of older Leicas (M5s), because the little voice in my head said I needed the more accurate framelines.  But with these older cameras the rangefinder patch doesn't snap into focus like a modern Leica -- the ghost image is just a bit more feint.  And I've had a number of these cameras pass through my hands over the years (M4s and M5s), and they're all the same, whether they've had a CLA or not.  <br />
<br />
Is this something that is epidemic of the older rangefinders?<br />
<br />
Would a 1.25x magnifier help?  <br />
<br />
I don't use rangefinders much anymore (the Leicaflex SL rocks!!!), but this annoying issue is ensuring that I use them even less.<br />
<br />
Can something be done, other then going back to a modern Leica?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10">Leica M Film Cameras</category>
			<dc:creator>steveyork</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133025</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Herein lies the future</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133024&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:39:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[http://petapixel.com/2013/05/22/on-the-constant-moment/

An interesting read where photography is headed. It also helps explain the one word I can't...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://petapixel.com/2013/05/22/on-the-constant-moment/" target="_blank">http://petapixel.com/2013/05/22/on-the-constant-moment/</a><br />
<br />
An interesting read where photography is headed. It also helps explain the one word I can't stand and how it has become appropriated, &quot;curated&quot;, and how it has begun to be applied today.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=110">Photography General Interest</category>
			<dc:creator>kbg32</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133024</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Small camera for 3 months around the globe?</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133023&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi everybody!

I´m not a big fan of these "what camera" posts but here I go! I need your input on this one...

My lady an me are planning a long trip...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi everybody!<br />
<br />
I´m not a big fan of these &quot;what camera&quot; posts but here I go! I need your input on this one...<br />
<br />
My lady an me are planning a long trip this summer around the globe, starting in Istanbul, then Southeast Asia, China, Japan, USA and finally Cuba. Such a stress test for a recently married couple!!<br />
<br />
We want to travel really really light, just 2 backpacks and keep everything to a minimum. Sure I want to take some trillions of pictures but my photography skills and style changed quite a lot. Sold all my gear (including M8 and M6) and I´m looking for a small and reliable digital camera which fills these needs: <br />
<br />
- Digital. I´ll probably take an Olympus XA or mju but those moments but most of the shooting will be digital. We also plan to update our wedding blog constantly so jpg are the way to go.<br />
- Cheap! Surely a second hand one. Don´t need last models, will prefer older and cheaper ones. Ideally like 300-500 euros max.<br />
- Sensor size no less than Micro 4/3. I have a Samsung S3 for pictures with huge dof already...<br />
- Decent battery life. We´ll be walking and moving most of time, and the camera should be able to be on most of the day. 100-150 shots as average maybe?<br />
- Reliable. M8 is a no go for this travel imho.<br />
- SMALL Ideal size would be a GF1+20mm<br />
- Decent low light. ISO 1600 good enough with color, entry level dslr quality if posible. Able to shoot f2-1/30-800 with nice results.<br />
- Viewfinder is welcome but not 100% needed.<br />
- &quot;stealth&quot; enough not to atract pickpockets. Black and easy to hide.<br />
<br />
I know it´s a quite hard list. Any sugestion for a camera that should be basicaly small, cheap and with good performance?<br />
I had the X100 in mind but I´d prefer something even smaller and I´m not crazy about the slow focus comments. GF1 looks great but never tried one. NEX-5 great but fast lenses are huge. NX1000 seems a good contender but it seems Samsungs jpgs are not that great...<br />
<br />
Thanks!!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=142">Travel</category>
			<dc:creator>Kozhe</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133023</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Interesting new kickstarter project</title>
			<link>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133022&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:53:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi,

just FYI:

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/ncd/the-nashville-community-darkroom?ref=live</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi,<br />
<br />
just FYI:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/ncd/the-nashville-community-darkroom?ref=live" target="_blank">http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/...kroom?ref=live</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=110">Photography General Interest</category>
			<dc:creator>Skiff</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133022</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
