View Full Version : exposure compensation
Todd.Hanz
02-15-2008, 14:05
Say a guy was shooting Tri-X at 400, then noticed near the end of the roll his exposure compensation slipped into -2 range, what then? Would he develop as if he rated it 2 stops faster (ISO 1200) or 2 stops slower (ISO 100)?
Just speaking hypothetically ;)
Todd
Kim Coxon
02-15-2008, 14:10
You have under exposed by 2 stops so my reckoning would be 1600ASA.
However, I would wait for confirmation. ;)
Kim
Say a guy was shooting Tri-X at 400, then noticed near the end of the roll his exposure compensation slipped into -2 range, what then? Would he develop as if he rated it 2 stops faster (ISO 1200) or 2 stops slower (ISO 100)?
Just speaking hypothetically ;)
Todd
Quinn Porter
02-15-2008, 14:11
Process as if shot at ISO 1600.
erikhaugsby
02-15-2008, 14:16
If the EV compensation is -2, it would underexpose by 2 stops (as if the film was EV 1600). Develop accordingly.
Whatever you do, post some samples here ;)
Todd.Hanz
02-15-2008, 14:49
Whatever you do, post some samples here ;)
Will do, thanks everyone.
BTW, I shot a roll of Acros the same way before I realized it...this should be a joy:rolleyes:
Todd
charjohncarter
02-15-2008, 15:50
Which shots are the most important? If it is just the last few, dump them, if it is most of the roll develop for 1600. Or go buy some Diafine and throw it in and according to some here everything will come roses.
It's Todd. They'll look great anyway.
Todd.Hanz
02-19-2008, 05:09
O.k.,
I souped them in Xtol, stock. Here are a few from a roll of Acros dialed in at 100 but with the Exposure comp set at -2 they were really shot at 400. I dev'ed them for 9 min based on the Massive Dev Chart for Tmax 100 time.
Mamiya 7II and 80/4
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/data/500/sombrerito--III.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2045/2276479756_6aa6e82d69_o.jpg
Todd
bmattock
02-19-2008, 05:19
They sure look nice to me!
Todd.Hanz
02-19-2008, 05:37
I like 'em, seems a happy accident ;)
Todd
Kinda ticks me off that you can screw up and still get great results! :)
I guess it really IS the photographer.
Kinda ticks me off that you can screw up and still get great results! :)
I guess it really IS the photographer.
The phtographer was Todd. 'Nuff said.
Nice, thanks for sharing those.
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.