show me something from the canon 35/2...

[-vin-]

As in the title.:)

And a question: should I prefer a canon 35/2 over a skopar 35/2.5?

[wallace]

I have no idea, but would like to know it too!

[ferider]

You should prefer the Ultron over the Canon :)

[RayPA]

I like the size of the CS 35/2.5. It's a very capable lens. Some find it too contrasty, which I would agree that it is indeed contrasty and sharp. It's very nicely priced and a great size. On a M4-P, it slides nicely into a jacket pocket.








.

[vrgard]

Well, if we're going to open this up to slightly slower lenses, there's also the Canon 35/2.8 to consider, as well as the Leica 35/2.8 Summaron.

-Randy

[RayPA]

You can use Alikis, Robert, and Roland's Flickr M-Group for images. Here's the Canon page (http://www.flickr.com/groups/m-mount/discuss/72157600006082670/).






.

[M. Valdemar]

Don't have photos handy but EXCELLENT lens. You would be very wise to buy one.

[RayPA]

I seem to remember some images taken with this lens showing it to have the infamous "fish scale" bokeh on oof specular highlights/lights. (????) If you plan on using it wide open a lot in this type of condition maybe that's a consideration. I've only had mine for about two weeks, and I've only shot with it stopped down.

[KEH]

Here's a favorite from my gallery:

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/data/500/EPS1406.jpg

The flare at the top is probably partly the sensor (R-D1) rather than the lens. I have seen examples of fish-scale bokeh on this site, but not in my work.

Small, light, very good.

Cheers,
Kirk

[-vin-]

I bought it. It should arrive in a week or so... :D

[-vin-]

You should prefer the Ultron over the Canon :)

I think size is completely different... And I'm a small-size-lenses guy. :)

[back alley]

Here's a favorite from my gallery:

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/data/500/EPS1406.jpg

The flare at the top is probably partly the sensor (R-D1) rather than the lens. I have seen examples of fish-scale bokeh on this site, but not in my work.

Small, light, very good.

Cheers,
Kirk

wow, i like that shot!

[-vin-]

wow, i like that shot!

yes, really nice!

but it's more from the photographer than from the lens. a good descriptions of those moments after a rainfall.

[back alley]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2368/2219652654_52d432729e.jpg

[burninfilm]

Here's a few shots from the well-used Canon 35/2 that I used to have. I'll definitely find another example in the future, as it was a really neat, compact lens that produced good results. I suggest that anyone using this lens be ABSOLUTELY sure that your fingers are out of the way. The lens is so compact, that when I first started using it, I had several frames with the lower right corner blocked off. A small hood would probably help this, as well as reducing flare from this classic wide-angle Canon.

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/BurninFilmzd/Show4scopy-1.jpg

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/BurninFilmzd/Show26scopy-1.jpg

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/BurninFilmzd/Show10scopy.jpg

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/BurninFilmzd/Show18scopy.jpg

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/BurninFilmzd/Show33scopy.jpg

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/BurninFilmzd/Show49scopy.jpg

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/BurninFilmzd/Show44scopy.jpg

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/BurninFilmzd/Show1scopy.jpg

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/BurninFilmzd/Show34scopy.jpg