Good quality 90mm f3.5-4 lens

[davidzapr]

Hi and thanks to all who answer! I Am having my CL with 40mm summicron CLA'ed by dag, and I have a Bessa R3A. I have been searching for a good quality 90mm f3.5-4 lens to accomany theses camers, that is also not too expensive as the camera will be in my car and I do not want to risk my 90 summicron or 90 macro elmar to theft. I have bought, and returned, 2 Leica Elmar C lenses off of Ebay that were supposed to be 'mint'(and I even asked the second seller to check the lens...) and they both had haze and/or fungus(in the second one) in the interior surfaces. Even though the mechanics were truly mint, I use my lenses to actually take pictures. I do not want to risk another Elmar. What do you think of the Voigtlander 90mm f3.5 Lanthar? I can get that new. Or if anyone here has another suggestion I am all ears.... I just wish sellers knew to check their lenses with a flashlight to check for haze/fungus. The second seller I even asked to do this and said all was fine! I don't mind a little dust, but gosh! Anyway, rant over. Thanks to all who reply!!

David

[Larry H-L]

Canon 100mm f3.5 with LTM-M ring.

[davidzapr]

How easy is it to get one of those canon lenses Larry?

[boilerdoc2]

CV lens is really really good! Especially for the money and it'll be new!
Steve
PS: See Sean Reids review of the 90s. www.reidreviews.com

[davidzapr]

Yes, I did see Sean's review! I always like to ask here, some of you guys have like 40 years of experience(I have Esp. liked Raid's comments, observations). Thanks Steve for the suggestion!.

[etrigan63]

Is there any chance that CV will release the 90mm Lanthar in an M-mount version? I would like a low-cost alternative to the upcoming Summarit 90mm and I am not too crazy about using LTM lenses with adaptors.

[davidzapr]

Who knows? Some of the lenses have made the jump to M only, but others have not.

[vrgard]

The other alternative is to wait until a Leitz/Rokkor one pops up here in the rff classifieds. You're much more likely to get one in good condition that way.

-Randy

[davidzapr]

Your right about that Randy. Everything I have bought here has been perfect, probably because we are all photographers and know what we would like to see if we bought an item like a lens.

[BillBingham2]

What about the original Leica 90/4 from years ago? They came in M mount and were a great size. If you want to chance something a bit bigger you might look at a Steinheil Munchien 85/2.8. They were small and said to be sharp.

B2 (;->

[oscroft]

I am not too crazy about using LTM lenses with adaptors
Any particular reason why not? (purely out of curiosity).

[RHaroldP]

CV for the price and performance.

[payasam]

My Steinheil Culminar 85/2.8 works well. A 90/4 Elmar is an excellent option. A screw lens with an M adapter becomes an M mount lens. When I had an M3 I would often forget that my lenses were all LTM.

[Vincenzo Maielli]

Voigtlander Apo Lanthar 90 mm f/ 3,5. I own one and perform very well, with a very outstanding sharpness.
Ciao.