View Full Version : Critique #4 (5 person, 1 image/person)
Welcome to this critique thread. Please read the purpose statement and the guidelines/ground rules regarding participation.
Purpose
The primary purpose of this thread is to provide a forum where photographers can give and receive constructive criticism on one another's photographs. By setting up some basic guidelines we hope that this thread will provide a forum where the give and take of honest constructive criticism can help us become better photographers.
Guidelines/Ground Rules
The thread has very specific rules regarding participation. The one basic rule is that you cannot provide criticism on an image or comment in a critique thread unless you also have an image posted. To post an image to this thread you must be a participant. Participation in this thread is limited. Here are the guidelines and ground rules for participation:
Participation in this thread is limited to 5 photographers
Participants join the thread by posting their intention. You can simply reply with your intent to join by posting something like: "I'm joining," "I'm in," or just state your name
Joining is on a "first come, first served" basis. The first 5 to reply become the participants
Once the thread has 5 participants, no other photographers can join or participate in the thread
Once the thread is full of participants all photographers will upload their image(s)
The number of photos for each participant is limited to one
Photographers attach photos as thumbnails (no inline images or links)
Photographers post their images supplying titles (if any) and other pertinent information (the amount of information should be minimal)
Photographers can only comment on their own images and reply to comments only when everyone else in the thread has posted their comments on the image
Every participant must comment on every photo (except their owninitially)
Every participant must make at least two comments, one positive comment, and one constructive criticism (which is actually two positive comments)
Once every photographer has commented then a free flowing discussion begins. It is at this point that every photographer can comment on their own work and reply to comments, ask questions, etc.
The participants decide when the thread closes.
If you'd like to participate in a critique thread and need some ideas about how to proceed with viewing images critically, you may find this thread helpful:
How do you look at photos (http://rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26459)
You can also provide feedback on critique threads here:
Critique Feedback Thread (http://rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26611)
Remember: Please do not provide criticism on an image or comment in a critique thread unless you also have an image posted.
This thread is now active, please follow the guidelines if you'd like to participate! Have Fun!
.
meeeeeeeeeee
EDIT: nobody likes me... :(
Question. So do the images have to relate to each other or any image at all?
BrianShaw
08-04-2006, 13:54
EDIT: nobody likes me... :(
You need to work on your self-esteem. ;) People here are generally very friendly!
EDIT: Oh... that was not a critque, Chris... just a friendly comment.
wlewisiii
08-04-2006, 14:50
I'll get in on this one.
William
count me in again unless someone new comes around, I'd rather not go twice on this if someone who hasn't had a shot would like one.
Bump! Need one more here! :)
.
OK, I don't (yet) have anything of the quality that some of you others have, but I'll have a go (I've been reading the other critique threads, and I think they're a great idea - I always welcome critical opinion)
wlewisiii
08-04-2006, 22:37
Ok, we've got our 5, so before I toddle off to bed, here is my image. Reala, collapsible 'Cron, sunny 16. A local industrial park that is being turned into condos... :eek: the crane is explicitly to be saved. My gut reaction is "yeah, right..." ;)
William
FED 1g, J-12, Kodacolor with the colour removed by computer trickery...
RF645, 100mm, ancient Portra 160VC (1990s)
artificial vignette because I think it works with the image. Obviously cropped from a 645 neg.
Heres mine. Mamiya 6x4.5. Tri-X asa 400 developed in Microdol-X 1-1.
how does one attach a thumbnail? :P And does it have to be shot with a rangefinder?
As far as I'm concerned it does not have to be a rangefinder shot. My entry is not.
Open a post reply and scroll down to the bottom of the page to find a box labled "manage attachments". Click on that and you will then be able to brouse your files to select an image by title. Find what you want and enter it and then hit "upload". It will then be attached to your post.
Canon 5D, 16-35 f2.8L, B/W Conversion done in PS.
Just so everyone knows, I am working at a film festival this weekend so I won't be able to make quick replies here! I'll try to do it in the evenings when I return though.
What a great selection of images. I'm going to go down the list in the order they appear in the thread.
Wlewisiii: Strong composition with interesting visual line intersections. A well composed photograph. Based upon the description of the camera and lens used I'll bet there is more detail in the image than I can see on the monitor. I would like to see more detail in the sky which if a bit darker would also put some more graphic weight to the top of the image.
Oscroft: You dog! And I quote, " I don't (yet) have anything of the quality that some of you others have, but I'll have a go ".
Sounds like the old " I've never played pool before but I'll give it a go. Do you want to make it interesting and put some money on the game?".
This is an excellent photograph imo. I love texture shots. I love sharply focused subjects. I love well composed lines and I love captured lightplay through objects . This photo has it all in a well executed exposure.
The only thing which caught my eye might be no more than a personal preference. I would have liked the bricks in the lower portion of the image to be darker. Perhaps not as dark as the upper bricks but showing a little more detail and contrast than in the image shown. I don't know if this could be done in ps (at least I don't know how) or if it would have to be done when printing. I don't propose than the entire image be darkened to do this. Just a subtle burn in on the lower bricks.
Shutterflower: Wow! There are so many things to like about this photograph. The underlying compositional line form of the image is to my mind perfect. The eye is drawn in from the left and is lead to the subject and then on with sensually curving lines. The subject is an absolute honey with the just the right expression for the shot.
Two things would have made it even better imo. A reflector on the right to put a bit more light on the shadowed side of her face and highlight the eye that is visable. And moving the subject horizontally (by crop or camera movement) just a smidgen to the right. If a little more of her lower body was visable on the left I think the shot would balance better.
RdEoSd: A wonderful shot. I really like images that repeat into a perspective infinity. I also like shots that emote mood. The image works very well just as it is but I wonder if it could be even more graphically powerful if you did two things.
1. Play with the contrast some more in ps and see if you could get a bit more contrast into the trees and fence line without burning out the rest of the image.
2 Use a non traditional crop for this image. That is to say crop more off the top and the bottom to make more of a landscape wide angle look. This will imo increase the impact of the strong compositional line of the shot.
wlewisiii
08-05-2006, 09:43
4 wonderful images. I'll just use the order presented as well, that seems easiest. I am glad this isn't a contest - I'd really dislike having to vote for one of these over the rest.
Oscroft: Love the use of the diagonals to partition the space. It gives a nice feel of the place to the image. I too think that the lowest bricks might have be a little better if darker. The other possibility, depending upon the color of paints and the bricks, is that it might have worked as well or better left in color.
Shutterflower: Great playful use of the driftwood as well as using it to establish the line of the composition that is then followed on by the model. The only thing I can suggest is that in that kind of light I'd prefer the models face to be less shadowed. Just a bit (or bit more?) fill flash would suit it well.
Remrf: Nice almost casual portrait. Like a candid almost, but I'd bet deep in the middle of a session. The details at the model are nice and sharp with a good use of a completly blurred out background. Depending on what's on the neg, cropping with the whole of the bent elbow in frame and cutting back the other side would have worked well to establish a line from elbow through the eyes and up out of frame to where she's looking.
RdEoSd: That's a very interesting image of a very scarey location. The towers, the wire fence tilting inward imprisoning the trees. Combined with the infinity receeding perspective gives a very definate feel. Would this have been taken at military training base? One possibility I see would be to crop to a square format - leave all of the nearest tree and the nearest guard tower in and then square the crop off. This would cut back a bit on the huge expanse of sky and tighten up, even further, the emotional feel of the location.
Thank you all,
William
Canon 5D, 16-35 f2.8L, B/W Conversion done in PS.
I like snow pictures, and this one is well exposed. I would have cropped in to bring up the impact of the objects on the far right. . . signs? But, this is because I don't think the left side of the image adds a whole lot to the composition. It has continuity until one's eye reaches the end of the treeline going toward the left of the frame.
EDIT : the left side is what i would tend to crop out, not the right. . .obviously.
Heres mine. Mamiya 6x4.5. Tri-X asa 400 developed in Microdol-X 1-1.
Well done technically. Nice exposure, well developed, etc.
Crop the top portion of the image off. Bringing her head out of the center of the composition a tad. I feel like maybe choosing a bias to the left or right side, but that might not have any real merit. But, really, I can't visualize how to do this because you don't want to create a disembodied hand on the head. . . and if you cut off the left side, you have the problem of her physical gesture suddenly becoming rather oddly overpowering.
I do think that it looks like she is either reacting to wind or having been hit or nearly hit on the head with something. Her expression of surprise kind of reflects this. Maybe her hat flew off in the wind?
Cute picture. Seems like a good one to have in a series that includes some more formal or less candid shots.
OK, here's are my thoughts in the order the photos were posted...
wlewisiii - I do like industrial subjects (and for some reason I especially like decaying industrial architecture). What I especially like about this one is the juxtaposition with the trees - it's as if nature is encroaching on what man has left behind and is reclaiming it, and so it adds a dynamism to what can easily be a very static subject. My only suggestion for change is that I wonder if it would be improved by cropping more tightly. I'd try a fairly heavy crop at the left - perhaps almost as far as the visible vertical trunk of the tree, and then a crop along the bottom to rebalance the proportions (It would lose the thirds proportions that you have achieved, though, so it might not work, but it might be worth a go).
shutterflower - I love the mood, the thin colours, the model's expression, and the lighting. And I like the vignetting in the top corners - it gives a "naughty Victorian" feel to the picture. But what really makes it for me is the exposure. You've got it spot on in what looks like difficult lighting conditions - her face is exposed just right, and the white clothing is held back from being overblown. I also really like the driftwood - the contrast with the soft texture of the model's skin works well. My constructive criticism has to be the sloping horizon - it may be deliberate, and it may actually work for some people, but for me it distracts my eye a little from the actual subject.
remf - What a great facial expression! And the direction the model is looking and focussing her attention disguises the fact that it is a posed shot and makes it look natural. Lovely mid tones, and very nicely exposed. And the background is excellent too - degree of out-of-focus is just about right, and the dark area behind the model's head helps to draw your eyes to hers. The reflection on her brow just above her left eye, and the contrast between the shadow under her left arm and the bright bit of background are perhaps a bit distracting, but only a little.
RdEoSg - High-key scenes like that are so hard to get right, but I think you've done a splendid job of it - I like it a lot. Exposure looks just about perfect, and I like the way you have two lines (the line of the top of the trees, and the line of the fence posts) converging and drawing the eye into the shot. I'm at a bit of a loss to suggest any improvement in this, but if I had to try something I might try a tighter crop (I can get a bit obsessive about cropping sometimes). Perhaps cropped to just past the leftmost fencepost, and just eliminating that distant post on the right (with top and bottom crops to retain the proportions)? But then again, that might destroy the splendid isolation of the trees, and maybe it's best left well alone. I'd love to see a bigger "print" of this one.
Thanks all, I've enjoyed doing this, and it's gracious of you all to give me the chance to comment in this way.
Best regards,
FED 1g, J-12, Kodacolor with the colour removed by computer trickery...
like the geometry, textures, composition, except I would not have included the left portion of the image in the frame (or, I wouldn't if I were to frame this). The geometrical continuity and division into thirds works well with the sequence of textures and tones, but is broken somewhat by the left portion where this continuity is not. . . continued. My eye is caught at first by angular offset of the light/shadow thrown by the grate and railing.
I would also correct the tones a little bit. On my monitor, this shot looks slightly bright. BUt, I am on a very bright LCD monitor.
shutterflower - [...] My constructive criticism has to be the sloping horizon - it may be deliberate, and it may actually work for some people, but for me it distracts my eye a little from the actual subject.
Best regards,
I know. That was an issue for me. We had to choose between a crowd in one background and that skyline in the other. I used the vignetting somewhat to pull down the intensity of the background for this very reason.
Ok, we've got our 5, so before I toddle off to bed, here is my image. Reala, collapsible 'Cron, sunny 16. A local industrial park that is being turned into condos... :eek: the crane is explicitly to be saved. My gut reaction is "yeah, right..." ;)
William
hmm. . .
The story behind the image adds alot to it. As it stands, I don't find my eye taken anywhere in particular in the image. This might be a decent bit of strategy on your part, maybe highlighting the nature of the scene and the impending development.
I have a hard time shooting things like this. bridges, railroad tracks on bridges, anything made of metal like this, cranes, whatever, I have a hard time finding eye catching form without using wide angle lenses and extreme POVs that create sharply converging lines. If you had found a way of bringing the crane into more prominence in the image, or even knocking it way down below the surroundings, that would have produced a bit more useful contrast to the composition. It has more historical and informative value than aesthetic value - which is really the use of the picture as you explain in your caption. . . so my comments mean nothing, really, since I am criticizing the image as if it were some attempt at bringing a beautiful perspective on cranes into life on film.
wlewisiii: I really like how you've taken something industrial and thrown in nature as well. It's an interesting combination. One thing I might have tried, though I don't know if I would like it better or not would have been to throw the plants out of focus some so that you could still tell what they were, but then the industrial part was sharp. As it is I have a bit of a hard time figuring out where the subject is. It's obvious that its supposed to be the metal parts, but I can't help but feel too much is in focus!
oscroft: The shadow really makes this image for me. I love the diagonal lines running through it and the break up of the bricks. The only thing I would have done and I think someone else mentioned it as well was to possibly darken down the bottom bricks some. I am using a laptop with a bit of a bright screen though so they could be darker on a normal monitor already!
shutterflower: I like the square crop on this and the vingetting on the edges of it. she has a great look! My only alteration would be to get a bit more light on her face, especially the eyes so they really pop! As they are now, they get lost in the shadow a bit.
remrf: Ok I'm having a hell of a time with this one! I just love the shot! As it is I wouldn't recomend anything, but since that is the object and we are supposed to say something, I guess all I could think of would be to possibly crop closer to the top of her head. It's just dead space at the top to me, but thats just a personal thing. I like to chop the tops of heads off, to others thats a major no no!
Well done everyone.. and I apologize for being so late at this. I just got back from the film festival. Been there for 12 hours straight today!! And again tomorrow! :P I got some great shots in the projection booth though with the big 35mm projectors running!
Thanks everyone for you comments.
Everyone has picked up on the lightness of the bricks at the bottom, and I agree. The ground below them was composed of very light stone slabs, so the lower bricks got extra illumination by reflection.
Considering going back to the original colour version, the bricks are quite nicely coloured (a mid reddish tone), but I really don't like it in colour (in fact, the first thing I thought when I saw the pic was that it desperately needed to be in B&W) - to me the colour distracts from the line and form. I've had a play with just leaving a little thin colour in place, but that just looks silly.
I'll have to have a play with GraphicConverter (it's a Mac photo utility - I don't have PhotoShop) and see if there's anything I can do regarding "burning in".
Thanks again,
I know. That was an issue for me. We had to choose between a crowd in one background and that skyline in the other. I used the vignetting somewhat to pull down the intensity of the background for this very reason.
The thing that made me wonder whether the horizon was deliberate is that coupled with the vignetting, it gives the image a kind of "what the butler saw" feel ;)
If people ask, tell them it was deliberate :)
Thanks to all who participated in this round of critiques. I think every one of the suggestions concerning my posted photo have merit.
Wlewisiii nailed the circumstance perfectly. The shot was taken in the middle of a more "serious" session when the wind blew the model's hair and she turned from the position we were working and ran her hand through her hair. I was looking through the viewfinder at the time and liked what I saw so I had her do it again with a smile. As has happened to me more than once the "chance" shot of the session turned out to be one of,if not the best of the session.
I went back and looked at the full framed scan and there is nothing I can do concerning the left/right positioning of the model to get more or less of her hand or elbow or to change the centering of the shot very much. What you saw is the full frame. However I could play with the crop at the top and I did. I will have to live with it for a few days to see how I like it but first impression is that there was more space at the top than was needed and a tighter crop will work. I also got rid of the shine on her eyebrow as was also pointed out.
The first image is the full scan of the image. The second is the new crop. The third is the other "good" shot from the session. Or at least my other favorite. The model chose two that I did not like at all.
My sense of framing is telling me in the new crop her head is being crowded slightly. But my original upload had a bit too much space at the top so somewhere between those two points is the right place. I'll find it. :)
Oops. Got the wrong image in the first post. The first image should be this one. And the third mentioned is this one.
wlewisiii
08-06-2006, 08:03
Thank you all for your comments, I find them quite helpful. I'll try and address some of them now.
There is little sky detail because it was a solid overcast day. It was the fact that the crane stood out against that dull sky that intially caught my eye. I then moved until I found an angle on it that I liked (while trying to keep my son from running off down the bike path we were walking home on.) The greens made a nice vase, if you will for the metalic tones above. I was using sunny-16 that day and so had the aperture at around f16 and with a 4 year old along I didn't have enough time to play with opening it up to put the forground out of focus though it might be interesting to go back and try that someother time.
On cropping - when shooting smaller formats like 35mm & 6x6 I tend to try to frame in the finder to avoid doing much cropping in post processing. That doesn't mean I don't do it, just that I often don't think about it. In LF by contrast, I try to frame more loosely to have more cropping possibilities. Thinking about Oscroft's comments, I've done a tighter crop to see how it looks.
This is a type of subject I enjoy - decaying industrial remains. OTOH, I don't really care for gloom and doom looks either, so I tend to try to present them in the context of "life goes on". My recent "Burying Ground" (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=6037) series was done with that in mind as well.
Thanks again,
William
My sense of framing is telling me in the new crop her head is being crowded slightly. But my original upload had a bit too much space at the top so somewhere between those two points is the right place. I'll find it
I wasn't one of the ones who suggested cropping some off the top, but now that I've seen it I agree. But I agree with you that that's perhaps too much. I'd suggest maybe cropping so that the centre of the model's eyeline is at the 1/3 down position and then varying it from there (it's a little higher than that at the moment).
I like that second shot too.
REMRF :
your second shot in that most recent post is a good one. Her expression is somewhat mixed, but I like the angle. Might have tried a bit more frontal on her, instead of totally behind the tree, but that is a personal opinion and has nothing to do with the merit of your picture.
I like it. It would be a nice compliment to the first shot you posted in this thread.
Well about my image then! Thank you for the comments first off. If any of you hadn't worked out what the location was, it was Auschwitz. I agree on croping in on the left some what for the image. I prefer to leave in the right side, but I understand why some of you commented to crop it. In a bigger print it is much easier to see than small, but actually one of the secrets of figuring out what the image is, is on the right side. It is the famous building that the rail cars would come through to deliver the people. Think Schindlers List. It's much more obvious to see in a big print though. On the left side is actually the remains of one of the gas chambers, which is what the signs are describing. However, because of the snow covering it all, you can't really tell so I do think it is a bit distracting to see the modern signs there. I croped it out for a big print, but forgot to in this one!
One a side note, I put the big print of this in the Orange County Fair competiton here and won 2nd place in the pro division, so I was pretty pleased! Even better, and much more touching and satisfying for me though was that upon picking up the image after the fair, I found out someone is interested in buying it even after I had put down that it was not for sale. The lady has extended family members who were both survivors of the holocaust and also family members that perished. It was very touching to hear how much the image moved her.
I can honestly say this image and the others that go in the series are the most important I have ever taken. Its become a project for me and next year sometime I will be going back to do more work there.
RdEoSg :
I would leave in the right, take out the far left past the end of the treeline.
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.