Fuji X10?

[CK Dexter Haven]

Smaller camera, smaller sensor, no viewfinder.

http://thenewcamera.com/?p=6326

[Jamie Pillers]

"Mini Me" is back!

[rdeleskie]

If I'm not mistaken, it looks like the camera is mainly selling its retro looks, since there doesn't appear to be any advantage to handling (no VF) or sensor quality.

[Gabriel M.A.]

f/2 with "4x optical zoom"? OK, now I'm intrigued (and confused).

The "X50" supposedly keeps the same focal length (in the 4x3 sensor equiv. to 35mm, in line with the APS-C sensor equiv. to 35mm), no "optical zoom".

[Gabriel M.A.]

If I'm not mistaken, it looks like the camera is mainly selling its retro looks, since there doesn't appear to be any advantage to handling (no VF) or sensor quality.

I completely missed the missing VF (it is, after all, an alleged X10)

[Paul T.]

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=109732

[jsrockit]

So, are the X10 and the X50 the same camera?

[Paul T.]

Both names are speculation I think... but the discussions are about the same, slightly dodgy mockup!

[jsrockit]

I hold off for the X1000.

[robklurfield]

The new X0.5 has no lens and no sensor. Expected price $29.95. The rumor mills grinds on.;)

[tapesonthefloor]

Okay. I get it now. It's the Canon G12-killer (http://photorumors.com/2011/08/29/the-fujifilm-x10-name-is-confirmed-more-specs-available-online/). Fuji's trying to corner *all* the niche markets.

[umcelinho]

coming soon: Fuji X1

(ops, I think Leica got it first)

[mackigator]

Product demo video for the Fuji X10:
http://www.huhmagazine.co.uk/2719/video-fujifilm-x10-promo